February 2023

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Adobe SaaS Solutions With Microsoft Cloud

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By The Integration Of Adobe And Microsoft Solutions

Workplaces have become incredibly fragmented with the number of technologies deployed and hybrid approaches to work. Despite efforts to maintain consistent operations, technical hurdles are common, particularly with data access, security of data streams, and alignment of technology workflows for employee collaboration and productivity. CIOs can transform and align IT and business-team operations by investing in compatible solutions and fortifying their data-based foundations.

Microsoft supports native integration with Adobe’s solutions across its platforms. Applications including Adobe Creative Cloud, Adobe Document Cloud, and Adobe Experience Cloud (including Adobe Experience Platform) can be connected and made accessible through Microsoft Azure, Dynamics 365, Microsoft 365, and other services to improve data services, cloud flexibility, and overall security. In fact, Adobe built data applications like Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, and Adobe Journey Optimizer natively on Microsoft Azure to ensure reliable integrations.

Adobe and Microsoft commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by natively integrating their solutions. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of integrating Adobe and Microsoft solutions at their organizations.

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five business and IT decision-makers and surveyed 52 respondents who have experience managing and using Adobe and Microsoft solutions following integrations at their organizations. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a multinational, industry-agnostic business with 5,000 employees and revenue of $1 billion per year.

Interviewees said that prior to adopting Adobe SaaS solutions and integrating with Microsoft Cloud, their organizations struggled to reconcile information from data streams across their servers into actionable insights for marketing teams. The organizations were in the process of migrating to the cloud, and this led to fragmented data streams between on-prem and cloud servers. Meanwhile, for IT teams, ad hoc content management and marketing solutions required time-consuming custom integrations with their organizations’ on-prem or cloud platforms of choice. These configurations necessitated regular maintenance and oversight from IT staff to avoid outages and security risks. Interviewees said frustrations about these technical challenges made them feel the business potential of their organizations was being held back.

Since investing in Adobe and integrating its SaaS solutions with the Microsoft Cloud, the organizations’ IT teams avoided labor around integrating point solutions with Microsoft. Integrations also did not result in any technical outages, and they protected the security of stored data and files. Data teams derived deeper insights by eliminating data silos and marrying their first-party data on the Microsoft Cloud with behavioral data and other customer experience data from Adobe. Sharing of data and insights was accelerated by apps and services syncing data in real time (e.g., Dynamics 365 with Adobe Commerce), and this helped to accelerate decision-making and activation. As a result, the organizations shortened marketing project timelines while generating stronger results.

Consulting Teams: Corey McNair, Carmen Serradilla Ortiz


Key Statistics

  • icon
    ROI%
    251%
  • icon
    BENEFITS PV
    $1.3M
  • icon
    NPV
    $925K
“Managing data is much faster and seamless because you’re hosting Adobe software on your data platform — Microsoft Azure. The connecting pipes are prebuilt, and it’s all secure.... Adobe’s and Microsoft’s connectivity accelerates productivity and real-time decision-making.”

Chief digital and information technology officer, biopharmaceutical

Key Findings

Quantified Benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Time savings through streamlined deployment.

    IT teams save time on deployment of Adobe Experience Cloud to Microsoft Cloud by avoiding building new APIs or connectors to enable integrations. Due to this improvement, the deployment of Adobe SaaS solutions across the composite organization takes less than a month to complete compared to the months it previously would have taken with other on-prem or cloud platforms. IT teams still require additional time to migrate data to the Microsoft Cloud.

  • Increased IT and security team productivity by 20%.

    Organizational consolidation of data sources under one suite of data solutions provides a stronger foundation, so it rarely loses data and receives it in real time without error. Having enhanced control over data access allows the composite’s IT and security teams more visibility and control over employee access and data sharing, which frees bandwidth for teams to focus on enriching their first-party data with third- party data. The composite organization recognizes $762,000 in value from this increase in productivity over three years.

  • Accelerated marketing efforts since integration due to enhanced data analysis.

    Having greater visibility and management of data residing in the Microsoft Cloud improves the composite organization’s quality of insights and customer data profiles Adobe tools help produce. The data analysts experience accelerated speed of data analysis by 15% (6 hours weekly). With faster insight delivery, their marketers increase speed of decision-making by 10%.

  • Incremental daily time savings for employees organization wide.

    The organization’s integration of Adobe Document Cloud solutions with Microsoft 365 applications like Outlook and Teams produces incremental time savings of roughly 5 minutes per week for the rest of the organization, which accelerates document productivity.

Unquantified Benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are qualitative or not quantified for this study include:

  • More successful marketing efforts due to increased employee self-service.

    Interviewees said that as a result of the CIO’s choosing to invest in integrating Adobe and Microsoft, self- service among their organizations’ marketers increased due to greater access to data with fewer mistakes (e.g., overwritten performance results, wrong data uploaded to customer profiles). Teams were able to create more accurate customer profiles and distribute more personalized marketing materials, resulting in greater customer engagement, loyalty, and marketing yield.

  • Improved security of files and data.

    Interviewees said now that their organizations’ data is stored in the Microsoft Cloud and directly imported into Adobe solutions, they feel more comfortable about the security of data because there are fewer vulnerabilities. In addition, two- factor authentication and single sign-on support reduced the number of logins and passwords needed, which interviewees felt was valuable in hybrid or remote work environments.

  • Greater employee satisfaction.

    According to interviewees, the integration of Adobe and Microsoft solutions improved the quality of life for their organizations’ employees. They can now complete processes that previously took several steps with just a few clicks. IT teams also recorded fewer incoming support tickets for data requests and fewer complaints from employees around data-management challenges.

  • Extended reach of marketing content produced with Adobe due to Microsoft Azure’s global footprint.

    The chief digital and information technology officer at a biopharmaceutical organization said Microsoft Azure’s support for worldwide cloud storage, alongside Adobe’s and Microsoft’s support for content distribution networks, helped their company streamline deployment of content and marketing materials on a global level. This reflects Adobe’s and Microsoft’s ability to increase efficiency in the creation, storage, and activation (the content supply chain) of the millions of asset variations needed for personalized customer journeys.

  • Reduction in investments for service integration.

    Interviewees at financial services and digital media companies said their organizations reduced their reliance on consultants and contractors around point-solution integration management as a result of the ease of integration with Adobe’s and Microsoft’s native connectors. This change in approach led to cost savings.

figure

Base: 52 decision-makers who have experience using and managing Microsoft and Adobe solutions at their organizations Note: Showing “agree” and “strongly agree.” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft and Adobe, August 2022

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Implementation and migration costs.

    Deployment of Adobe SaaS solutions on Microsoft Cloud only took a few weeks for implementation teams to complete. Adobe Experience Platform and Adobe solutions supporting native integration are integrated within a matter of minutes, whereas other Adobe SaaS solutions take up the majority of implementation work depending on the use case. The migration of data from on-prem servers to the Microsoft Cloud took several months to complete.

  • Ongoing management and training costs.

    Interviewees said small teams dedicated some time toward managing the ongoing integrations and maintenance around Adobe Experience Cloud and Adobe Document Cloud with the Microsoft Cloud. Employees went through brief trainings to learn how to leverage the integrations.

The financial analysis which is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $1.3 million over three years versus costs of $368,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $925,000 and an ROI of 251%.

figure

TEI FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY

From the information provided in the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering integrating Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft services.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that the integration of Adobe and Microsoft solutions can have on an organization.

  • icon
    DUE DILIGENCE

    Interviewed Adobe and Microsoft stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to their organizations’ solutions and services.

  • icon
    INTERVIEWS AND SURVEY

    Interviewed five representatives and surveyed 52 respondents at organizations where Adobe SaaS solutions are integrated with Microsoft services to obtain data with respect to costs, benefits, and risks.

  • icon
    COMPOSITE ORGANIZATION

    Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees and survey respondents.

  • icon
    FINANCIAL MODEL FRAMEWORK

    Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.

  • icon
    CASE STUDY

    Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A or additional information on the TEI methodology.

DISCLOSURES

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Adobe and Microsoft and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in integrating Adobe solutions with Microsoft services.

Adobe and Microsoft reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Adobe and Microsoft provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third- party survey partner.

“Before the integration, data was spread out all over the place. No one knew where data was stored, who had the latest update and we had issues with data being overwritten. ... We needed an approach that was more consolidated and better to manage across the marketing team.”

Chief information and security officer, financial software

Key Challenges

Forrester interviewed five decision-makers and surveyed 52 respondents with experience managing and using integrated Adobe and Microsoft solutions at their organizations. For more details on these individuals and the organizations they represent, see Appendix B.

Prior to investing in Adobe SaaS solutions and integrating them with the Microsoft Cloud, interviewees’ and respondents’ organizations relied on a variety of point solutions including customer data platforms (CDPs), cloud management platforms (CMPs), data management platforms (DMPs), customer relationship management (CRM) platforms. These solutions had custom-configured integrations with on-premises and cloud platforms for their data and marketing efforts.

Interviewees and survey respondents noted that their organizations struggled with common challenges from this digital infrastructure approach, including:

  • Lengthy deployment and maintenance of point-solution integrations.

    Decision-makers created teams, hired external contractors, or brought in consulting companies to help their organizations code or build API connectors when integrating and implementing best-of-breed solutions with their on-prem and cloud platforms. It took months to complete integrations and, since the organizations custom-built the connectors, it would lead to technical setbacks (e.g., outages, broken workflows). These interruptions required time from IT teams to resolve, and they slowed down end users’ productivity.

  • Poor alignment in data solutions limited insights for marketing personalization.

    Interviewees and respondents said their organizations’ tech infrastructures consisted of point solutions from different vendors with first- party data sitting on both on-prem and cloud servers. This made it difficult for IT teams to manage and distribute across teams. Lack of native support for integration between point solutions and Microsoft Azure, as well as with third-party audience data providers, limited the ability of analysts to connect the dots between data to better understand customers and marketing performance. As a result, analysts struggled to personalize marketing and target customers.

  • Inefficient marketing efforts resulting from IT investments in several custom-integrated point solutions.

    IT teams previously selected point solutions based on their capabilities and having the ability to add solutions as needed. However, this created fractured work environments for marketers. A lack of integration between solutions or data flowing between platforms in the cloud meant marketers couldn’t adjust personalized marketing messaging in real time to reflect performance. Passing along performance data took several steps that involved compiling, formatting, and uploading to colleagues. Delayed analysis of performance slowed the ability of teams to iterate on marketing materials and customer journeys. Meanwhile, lack of integration between solutions meant marketers had to send files individually and, depending on size, sharing them could be a slow process.

  • Concerns around security of data and files from integration approach.

    As a result of technical mishaps that occurred from custom integrations of point solutions with their operating systems as well as individual sharing of files, interviewees said they were uneasy about the security of their organizations’ data and files — especially with some data still residing on on- prem servers. Interviewees said any one of these gaps in the integration could be exploited to successfully attack their organizations’ data centers.

“In terms of technology selection, 10 years ago, it was mostly IT deciding what tool we [would] use. Today, it’s changed, and business stakeholders are involved. ... They now have a voice asking for cloud- based solutions and [making] sure tools are easier for business units to use.”

Vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics, digital media

“Data was siloed before the integration. We didn’t have a data lake, and CRMs would require manual work of uploading customer data to trigger campaigns. [This was] work that could be automated with an integrated ecosystem of technologies.”

CRM, loyalty and onboard retail director, travel

chart

Investment Objectives

The interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations opted to adopt Adobe SaaS solutions in part because of the strength of their integration with Microsoft services, which helped them address the following objectives:

  • Use technology with native integration connectors between solutions out of the box.
  • Consolidate tools under an all-in-one vendor integrated seamlessly with Microsoft Cloud to simplify tool deployment and management for IT teams.
  • Incorporate third-party data with first-party data and streamline data access and management across the organization with Microsoft Cloud and Adobe’s data solutions like Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, and Adobe Journey Optimizer.
  • Leverage consolidated customer data to enhance customer experiences.
  • Receive cloud support across solutions to deliver real-time insights and analysis about customers and marketing performance.
  • Use tightly integrated tools to enhance security and protection of files.
  • Enhance collaboration, decision-making, and performance among business teams.

Pictured right are Microsoft services and Adobe tools most implemented by survey respondents which serve as basis for services and tools deployed by the composite organization.

chart

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the five interviewees and the 52 survey respondents, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite.

    The composite organization is a multinational, industry-agnostic business that generates $1 billion in annual revenue and has 5,000 total employees. Among the employees, 125 are heavy users of Adobe solutions (e.g., Adobe Commerce, Adobe Asset Manager, Adobe Experience Manager [AEM]) and eight are data analysts who use Adobe analysis solutions (e.g., Adobe Journey Optimizer, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform). The rest of the organization’s employees leverage Adobe Document Cloud solutions. The organization has a single license for each Adobe SaaS solution deployed, and the cost is based on the number of customer profiles and related storage.

  • Deployment characteristics.

    The organization moves on from leveraging a set of best-of-breed ad hoc point solutions for marketing, content management, and data analysis and elects to adopt Adobe solutions. Although the composite already had Microsoft applications and solutions in place, they were not integrated with the previous ad hoc point solutions.

    Integrating Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft Cloud takes the composite less than a month to complete, and that includes reviewing compatibility, planning, and testing out of integration. The composite integrates all of Adobe’s analytic solutions; Adobe Commerce and Adobe Experience Cloud solutions including Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Experience Manager; and other Adobe solutions. Implementation teams integrate Adobe Experience Platform and other Adobe SaaS solutions with out-of-the-box connectors and Microsoft Cloud within minutes. Depending on the implementation team and use case for apps, other Adobe SaaS solutions take up the bulk of the integration work.

    The organization takes several months to migrate and move from data siloes to Microsoft Cloud, and its teams develop best practices to effectively leverage the integrated solutions together over time.

Key Assumptions
  • $1 billion annual revenue
  • 5,000 employees
  • Migrates from best-of-breed point solutions to Adobe SaaS solutions hosted on Microsoft Cloud

Total Benefits

Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with $144,050 $0 $0 $144,050 $130,955
Btr Increased productivity of IT/security teams $204,000 $312,120 $424,320 $940,440 $762,203
Ctr Value of accelerated data analysis and marketing efforts from integrations $74,163 $146,415 $243,321 $463,898 $371,235
Dtr End-user time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft $11,482 $11,746 $12,015 $35,243 $29,173
Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $433,695 $470,281 $679,656 $1,583,632 $1,293,566

Time Savings From Integration Of Adobe SAAS Solutions With Microsoft

  • Evidence and data.

    Interviewees and survey respondents said Microsoft’s native connectors for Adobe solutions helped their organizations’ IT teams circumvent hours of work when deploying Adobe solutions on Microsoft Cloud for it to host them. Workers avoided needing to build APIs or connectors to integrate solutions like they previously did to establish data sharing and workflows with prior point solutions because of Microsoft’s support for Adobe solutions.

    Beyond building out integration support, Adobe solutions running on Microsoft Azure mitigated time spent reviewing and adjusting configurations, including basic networking around firewall and network IP addresses to security server protection. Although migrating data from storage silos to the cloud still required effort from IT teams, the chief digital and information technology officer at the biopharmaceutical organization shared that their company got Adobe software up and running on Microsoft Azure within a matter of hours.

    The vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics at a digital media company noted that without their organization’s E3 license Microsoft 365, the company would have worked with up to 10 different security vendors to achieve the same level of protection. Specifically, this approach would have required configurations across each security solution, the use of different engineers with different skill sets, and time from them to set up the configurations. Between Adobe and Microsoft, only one team was responsible for integrations per region, and it ensured deployment of Adobe solutions onto Microsoft Cloud services was consistent.

  • Modeling and assumptions.

    For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

    • 10 full-time employees are tasked with deploying Adobe solutions on Microsoft Azure. Previously, these employees would allocate 30% of their time (12 hours per week) during 26 weeks to configure ad hoc point solutions to integrate correctly with the composite’s on-prem or cloud platforms.
    • Because of the native connectors between Adobe and Microsoft, integration of Adobe tools takes 90% less time than the composite’s previous approach to integrating similar tools.
    • The average hourly rate for an employee supporting deployment is $57.
  • Risks.

    Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:

    • The number of solutions deployed before adopting Adobe and whether Microsoft solutions were already deployed.
    • The size of the team dedicated to deployment, the amount of time they dedicate to deployment, and the team members’ hourly rates.
  • Results.

    To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $131,000.

“Instead of asking my team to build an API or connector, or outsourcing the work, we use native connectors between Adobe and Microsoft. We’ve been able to reallocate 15 members [of our 40 person team] members from our integration team in part because of the ease of the native connectors.”

Vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics, digital media

Time Savings From Integration Of Adobe SaaS Solutions With Microsoft

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 FTEs tasked with deployment of Adobe solutions Interviews 10 0 0
A2 Months spent on deployment of comparable solutions before Adobe (weeks Interviews 26 0 0
A3 Percentage of time dedicated to deployment Interviews 30% 0% 0%
A4 Improvement with Adobe deployment Interviews/survey 90% 0% 0%
A5 Subtotal: Time saved with Adobe integration A1*(A2*40)*A3*A4 2,808 0 0
A6 Average fully loaded hourly rate of a deployment employee TEI standard $57 $0 $0
At Time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft A5*A6 $160,056 $0 $0
Risk adjustment ↓10%
Atr Time savings from integration of Adobe Atr SaaS solutions with Microsoft (risk-adjusted) $144,050 $0 $0
Three-year total: $144,050 Three-year present value: $130,955
“By going with the vendor- supported native integration, [Microsoft and Adobe] have done all the testing already. You definitely avoid quite a few bugs you would otherwise get from your custom integration.”

Chief technology officer, financial services

Increased Productivity Of IT/Security Teams

  • Evidence and data.

    IT and security teams at interviewee’s organizations continued to experience productivity enhancements in the day-to-day maintenance and management of solutions. Integrations between Adobe and Microsoft solutions were reliable and ensured Adobe Journey Optimizer, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, and Adobe Real- Time CDP received data in real time without errors.

    Decision-makers said their organizations eliminated broken data and workflows that appeared too frequently with previous custom-configuration approaches. IT teams reallocated time spent reworking and conducting maintenance on prior configurations toward identifying opportunities to bring in third-party data to Adobe data platforms to enrich first-party data for more complete customer profiles.

    The consolidation of data sources under one suite further supported shifting time spent from technology toward data enhancement, and the organizations removed work related to compiling information across silos for upload to customer management platforms and data management platforms. The organizations rarely lost or accidentally overwrote data, which helped IT teams reduce recovery work. As a whole,decision-makers said combining Microsoft Azure with Adobe’s data platforms made for stronger foundations upon which their organizations could dependably draw insights.

    This data foundation also helped security teams avoid time spent monitoring various security solutions that supported the security of data stored within on- prem servers. These time savings multiplied based on the number of security solutions the organizations leveraged to support prior ad hoc point solutions.

    Through the Adobe and Microsoft integration, interviewees said security teams gained greater control over data access. Teams set consistent parameters for data sharing and ensured teams had access to only the data that they needed, which minimized risk of data exposure and the fallout of work that can come from that.

    IT teams gained more control and visibility of employee access to Adobe solutions through Microsoft Azure, ensuring users had the most up-to- date applications. The organizations also recognized incremental time savings by providing access to Adobe solutions through Azure Active Directory, and they added devices with access to their directories for single sign-on services. This eliminated time required to distribute licenses to individual users.

    These efficiencies added up for IT teams. Ninety percent of survey respondents said integrating Adobe’s Experience Cloud solutions with Microsoft reduced the amount of technical work for their organizations’ developers or engineers. Among respondents whose organizations saw a reduction, 16.2% said their company reduced technical work each month after integration.

  • Modeling and assumptions.

    For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

    • The organization has 20 employees on its IT and security teams.
    • The share of staff members reallocated grows from 10% in Year 1 to 20% in Year 3 as the organization migrates more of its data to the Microsoft Cloud and retires individual data siloes and solutions.
    • The average fully loaded annual salary of an IT /security employee is $120,000 in Year 1, and this grows by 2% each subsequent year to account for inflation.
  • Risks.

    Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:

    • The size of the IT and security staff teams.
    • The team members’ average annual salaries.
  • Results.

    To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $762,000.

“[Microsoft and Adobe] provided better controls to manage data access and efficiency for employees with finding data ... all while providing more secure pipelines with their tight integration.”

Chief information and security officer, financial software

Increased Productivity Of IT/Security Teams.

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 IT/security staff tasked with integrating and maintaining software infrastructure before adopting Adobe Interviews 20 20 20
B2 Percentage of IT and security staff reallocated since adopting Adobe (cumulative) Interviews 10% 15% 20%
B3 Subtotal: Reallocated staff B1*B2 2 3 4
B4 Average annual fully loaded salary of an IT/security employee TEI standard $120,000 $122,400 $124,800
Bt Increased productivity of IT/security teams B3*B4 $240,000 $367,200 $499,200
Risk adjustment ↓15%
Btr Increased productivity of IT/security teams (risk-adjusted) $204,000 $312,120 $424,320
Three-year total: $940,440 Three-year present value: $762,203
“Power BI usage has grown, and having the connection with Adobe Experience Cloud makes report generation easy. Incorporating first-party data from Adobe and data from other sources contributes to us having one unified business- intelligence view of our data.”

Chief technology officer, financial services

Value Of Accelerated Data Analysis And Marketing Efforts From Integrations

  • Evidence and data

    According to interviewees, the value of the combined power of Adobe solutions and Microsoft services extended beyond IT to business decision-makers and business results. Specifically, the speed that data analysts and marketers could share, review, and act on data increased significantly.

    By storing data within Microsoft Azure, the organizations’ data analysts no longer needed to sort between various data stacks or third-party data sources to cross-reference to derive insights. Rather, with a single data lake, they were able to complete analyses on broader swaths of data sets in one location. Having greater visibility over data enabled data analysts to assemble more complete customer- data profiles for more personalized marketing messaging.

    Analysts leveraged this data in real time with the support of prebuilt connectors between Adobe and Microsoft. They pulled in performance data from various use cases like Adobe Experience Manager sites directly to their companies’ data lakes in Microsoft Azure, immediately analyzed the data with Adobe Real-Time CDP and then automated adding the information to customer profiles to trigger more personalized marketing and engagement tactics. Data teams no longer needed to wait on IT teams to extract and format data to analyze because it became a seamless experience that accelerated data analysis.

    These insights extended beyond automating personalized messaging toward sharing insights across marketing teams to review their overall marketing approaches and accelerate decision- making speeds. Interviewees said through Adobe Analytics and Adobe Customer Journey Analytics connector with Power BI, data could be directly loaded into Power BI for analysts to create reports and visualizations to distribute with marketing leaders.

    Simplicity around formatting data imported to Power BI increased self-service for even marketers to assist in the work. The chief digital and information technology officer at a biopharmaceutical company estimated their organization’s marketing teams saved as much as 5 hours per week in receiving new reports to act upon. They said the speed with which data could be shared since integrating with Microsoft increased the frequency in which marketing teams ran A/B tests on content and marketing material. While not integrated with Azure, real-time reporting on the organization’s A/B tests increased marketers’ usage of Adobe Target.

  • Modeling and assumptions

    For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

    • The organization has eight data analysts.
    • The analysts recognize increasing time savings from 10% in Year 1 to 15% in Year 3 as the composite migrates more data to Microsoft Azure. During that time, data sharing across teams grows and time to conduct analysis improves.
    • The fully loaded annual salary for an analyst is $115,000 in Year 1, and this grows by 2% each subsequent year to account for inflation.
    • The composite’s power users are content and marketing employees who regularly leverage Adobe solutions in their work. The organization has 50 Adobe solutions power users in Year 1, and that number increases to 90 in Year 2 and to 125 in Year 3 as it moves more operations to Adobe solutions.
    • These power users spend roughly 30% of their time working with Adobe solutions. The speed with which they complete work accelerates by 5% in Year 1 specifically due to the integration, and this speed grows to 10% by Year 3. Faster data analysis drives improved collaboration and quicker time to decision-making.
    • The average fully loaded annual salary for a content and marketing staff member is $110,000 in Year 1, and this grows by 2% each subsequent year to account for inflation.
    • Forrester applies a productivity recapture rate of 50% to the time saved among staff employees, which means that half of the time recaptured is rededicated toward more meaningful work. The rest of time saved is allocated toward breaks from work.
  • Risks.

    Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:

    • The size of the organization.
    • The number of data analysts and content and marketing staff.
    • Compensation for employees.
  • Results.

    To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $406,000.

“Adobe’s and Microsoft’s integration helped us to make sure we have visibility to all of our data in [Microsoft Azure], run necessary analysis on it, and then activate it in Adobe to improve and personalize consumer experiences.”

Chief digital and information technology officer, biopharmaceutical

Accelerated in work efforts

Data analysis

15%
icon

Content/marketing

10%
“From a campaign perspective, workflows and defining who receives specific marketing content is more automated. Data flows from our CRM to Adobe tools. Now, we can manage parallel campaigns all while configuring personalized customer journeys.”

Global digital and e-commerce director, travel

Value Of Accelerated Data Analysis And Marketing Efforts From Integrations

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Data analysts who use Adobe SaaS solutions Composite 8 8 8
C2 Increase in speed of analysis through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft Interviews/survey 10.0% 12.5% 15%
C3 Average annual fully loaded salary of a data analyst TEI standard $115,000 $117,300 $119,600
C4 Subtotal: Value from increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft C1*C2*C3 $92,000 $117,300 $143,520
C5 Employees who work on content with Adobe SaaS solutions Composite 50 90 125
C6 Percentage of work time spent with Adobe SaaS solutions Assumption 30% 30% 30%
C7 Increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft Interviews/survey 5% 7.5% 10%
C8 Average annual fully loaded salary ofa marketer TEI standard $110,000 $112,200 $114,400
C9 Subtotal: Value from increase in speed of analysis through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft C5*C6*C7*C8 $82,500 $227,205 $429,000
C10 Productivity recapture TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
Ct Value of accelerated data analysis and marketing efforts from integrations (C4+C9)*C10 $87,250 $172,253 $286,260
Risk adjustment ↓15%
Ctr Value of accelerated data analysis and marketing efforts from integrations (risk-adjusted) $74,163 $146,415 $243,321
Three-year total: $463,898 Three-year present value: $371,235

“Sharing is the cornerstone of all of this. And with Microsoft Teams, you can preview Adobe docs or files [and] collaborate or sign them within the Teams window. We don’t have to download files separately or click links anymore. ... The Teams integration is a crucial feature.”

Chief technology officer, financial services

End-User Time Savings From Integration Of Adobe SaaS Solutions With Microsoft

  • Evidence and data.

    Across interviewees’ and respondents’ organizations, individual users saw incremental time savings with Adobe Document Cloud solutions integrated into Microsoft 365 applications like Outlook, SharePoint, and Teams. Employees could open Adobe PDFs within an email or SharePoint without opening Adobe Acrobat or Reader.

    They could also collaborate on document creation in real time through Teams and receive e-signatures through its integration with Adobe Acrobat Sign. While, this led to an overall small amount of time savings, the improvement contributed to stronger employee experiences.

  • Modeling and assumptions.

    For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

    • End users are employees who make use of Adobe Document Cloud solutions through their organization’s Microsoft integrations, including accessing Adobe Acrobat and Acrobat Sign through Microsoft Teams, Outlook, or SharePoint. The number of end users encompass the rest of the organization outside of the data analysts, content, IT, marketing, and security staff members already accounted for.
    • End users recognize incremental time savings of 5 minutes per week from the integration of Adobe solutions with Microsoft.
    • The average fully loaded hourly rate for an end user is $35 in Year 1, and it increases by $1 each subsequent year to account for inflation.
    • As with data and marketing analysis, users recapture 50% of their productivity and apply it to the time savings.
  • Risks.

    Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:

    • The size of the organization.
    • Compensation of employees.
  • Results.

    To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $29,000.

End-User Time Savings From Integration Of Adobe SaaS Solutions With Microsoft

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 End users interacting with Adobe SaaS solutions (excluding employees already accounted for) Composite 7,422 7,382 7,347
D2 Increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft (five minutes per week) Interviews 0.002 0.002 0.002
D3 Increased productivity with Adobe and Microsoft integration (hours) D1*D2*52 weeks 772 768 764
D4 Fully loaded hourly rate for an end user TEI standard $35 $36 $37
D5 Value from increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft D3*D4 $27,016 $27,638 $28,271
D6 Productivity recapture TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
Dt End-user time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft D5*D6 $13,508 $13,819 $14,136
Risk adjustment ↓15%
Dtr End-user time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft (risk-adjusted) $11,482 $11,746 $12,015
Three-year total: $35,243 Three-year present value: $29,173

Increase in marketing yield since integration for interviewee’s financial software organization:

20%

Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but did not quantify:

  • More successful marketing efforts due to increased employee self-service.

    Increased data sharing since the integrations enabled teams to iterate more quickly on marketing material and personalize content in real time to draw stronger engagement with customers. The chief information and security officer in the financial software industry said their organization has seen a 20% improvement in marketing yield since integrating Adobe Experience Cloud solutions with Microsoft Azure and Power BI.

    Specifically, the interviewee attributed the benefit to a reduction in human error around the uploading of data to the wrong customer profiles or losing performance results to data being overwritten. With data flowing correctly, they had bandwidth to focus more on the creative process and testing material to come up with more compelling content.

    Among survey respondents, 75% agreed that since integrating Adobe Experience Cloud with Microsoft Cloud, their organizations decreased the amount of time needed to create and execute digital customer experiences. Meanwhile, 57% of respondents indicated their organization saw an improvement in KPIs since integration. The biggest gain was in customer sentiment (e.g., Net Promoter Score℠) or customer loyalty at 45%.

    This result aligned with interviewees speaking to data-driven enhancements to customer experiences for greater personalization. The vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics at a digital media organization said: “If you have the integration, there’s strong promise to achieve better business results and turnaround time. ... We can be more agile and bring more real-time customer insight. With Power BI and Adobe data, we can visualize what type of content our customers consume [and] on what device and personalize for [them] based on that.”

chart
  • Improved security of files and data.

    Interviewees said that along with relieving security staff of some work effort since integrating Adobe and Microsoft, security teams felt their companies’ files and data were more protected. Having data stored in the Microsoft Cloud and imported directly into solutions with native connectors reduced the number of outside solutions or custom configurations with potential vulnerabilities in which data traveled around the company. While the organizations still employed other security solutions, interviewees said their organizations’ data and files specific to Adobe had not experienced any compromises. Meanwhile, two-factor authentication support and single sign-on support with Microsoft for Adobe solutions reduced the number of logins and passwords floating around at companies for access. Interviewees felt this was particularly valuable with the amount of remote work and opportunities for attack occurring today.

  • Greater employee satisfaction.

    Interviewees said their organizations’ workers appreciated the time savings created by the integration of Adobe and Microsoft solutions, and they welcomed the ease of use to leverage the integrations. The integrations made use cases intuitive — from a few clicks through Power BI for pulling up Adobe Analytics and/or Adobe Customer Journey Analytics data to sharing first- and third-party data back to Adobe Campaign or Adobe Experience Cloud to build customer profiles. Interviewees said another indicator of ease of use was seeing fewer support tickets related to data requests sent to IT and, as a result, there were fewer complaints from employees around difficulties with managing data.

“The real value of the connection between Adobe and Microsoft is to better manage leads in our contact center CRM. We created this integrated ecosystem where we could enable a lot of workflows that better manage our customer experiences. We were able to cut time dedicated on configuring marketing campaigns in half since the integration.”

CRM, loyalty, and onboard retail director, travel

“Instead of working with more security vendors for each Adobe solution, we have them natively integrated with [Microsoft Azure], and it’s easy to manage. We don’t have to hire different employees and worry about retaining them for each security solution. It’s very easy to manage.”

Vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics, digital media

“I do see that people are satisfied with the integration and [that it] helps them in their day-to-day work. We measure it quantitatively by the number of support tickets to infer if things are going well. We’ve definitely seen a number of tickets go down in this category.”

Chief technology officer, financial services

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might integrate Adobe and Microsoft solutions and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Extended reach of marketing content produced with Adobe due to Microsoft Azure’s global footprint.

    Like Adobe solutions, Microsoft Azure offers support for content distribution networks (CDNs). The chief digital and information technology officer at a biopharmaceutical company said Azure’s global footprint and cloud storage enabled their organization to leverage Adobe solutions alongside CDNs to disburse content and marketing materials worldwide. Previously, this would have required a devoted server for transferring assets and data alongside hours of time, depending on the file size.

  • Reduction in investments for service integration.

    Interviewees at the financial services and digital media organizations said their technical teams leaned on consultancies and contractors to integrate and manage configurations between their point solutions and Microsoft Cloud before adopting Adobe solutions. The organizations reduced their reliance on these consulting services with the ease of integration through Adobe and Microsoft’s native connectors. Survey respondents said their organizations decreased agency spend for technical support by an average of 15.2% since integration.

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A ).

Total Costs

Ref. Costs Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Dtr Implementation and migration costs $269,237 $0 $0 $0 $269,237 $269,237
Ftr Ongoing management and training costs $0 $38,622 $39,971 $41,267 $119,860 $99,149
Total costs (risk-adjusted) $269,237 $38,622 $39,971 $41,267 $389,097 $368,386

Implementation And Migration Costs

  • Evidence and data.

    With the native connectors between Adobe and Microsoft, interviewees said deployment of Adobe solutions on Microsoft Cloud only took a few weeks for their organizations’ implementation teams to complete. Teams still reviewed compatibility of solutions with their networks and ran tests to make sure workflows operated smoothly. For Adobe Experience Platform and other SaaS solutions supporting native integration with Microsoft Cloud, they are integrated within a matter of minutes. Meanwhile, depending on the use case, other Adobe SaaS solutions take up the bulk of planning and testing work.

    The most time-consuming portion of the migration was moving data from on-prem servers to the Microsoft Cloud. According to interviewees this took upwards of six months to complete.

  • Modeling and assumptions.

    For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

    • The full-time equivalent of three employees are involved with integrating Adobe SaaS solutions on Microsoft Cloud over a 2.4-week period (i.e., two weeks and two days). There may be more than three people involved in the integration across IT, marketing, and security teams, but time dedicated by employees over that time period equals the effort of three employees.
    • The fully loaded hourly rate for one of these employees is $57.
    • The full-time equivalent of four employees support data and site migration from data siloes and on-prem servers to Microsoft Cloud. The migration takes six months to complete.
    • The fully loaded hourly rate for an employee supporting the migration is $58.
  • Risks.

    Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:

    • The number of employees involved in deployment and migration.
    • The size of the data base that needs to be migrated to Microsoft Cloud.
  • Results.

    To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three- year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $269,000.

Implementation And Migration Costs

Ref Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 FTEs involved in integration of Adobe software with Microsoft Interviews 3 0 0 0
D2 Time spent on integration (weeks) Interviews/survey 2.4 0 0 0
D3 Fully loaded hourly rate of an employee A6 $57 $0 $0 $0
D4 Cost of integration D1*E2*E3*40hour week $16,416 $0 $0 $0
D5 FTEs involved in migrating data and sites over to Microsoft Cloud Interviews 4 0 0 0
D6 Time spent migrating data and sites to Microsoft Cloud (weeks) Interviews 26 0 0 0
D7 Hourly rate of an employee B4/2,080 hours $58 $0 $0 $0
D8 Cost of migration to cloud E5*E6*37*40 hours per week $240,000 $0 $0 $0
Dt Implementation and migration costs D4+D8 $256,416 $0 $0 $0
Risk adjustment ↑5%
Dtr Implementation and migration costs (risk- adjusted) $269,237 $0 $0 $0
Three-year total: $269,237 Three-year present value: $269,237

Ongoing Management And Training Costs

  • Evidence and data.

    Interviewees said their organizations had small teams responsible for managing the ongoing integration and maintenance around Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft Cloud and that ongoing maintenance accounted for a small portion of their time.

    After the migration, data analysts and content/marketing staff members were trained how to effectively leverage data. Training took minutes for employees to complete because it consisted of intuitive navigation.

  • Modeling and assumptions.

    For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

    • Three IT employees are tasked with spending 10% of their time toward managing the ongoing integration. The fully loaded annual salary of one of these employees is $120,000, and this grows at 2% annually based on inflation.
    • The number of employees trained on the integration consists of data analysts and content/marketing staff members. Training takes roughly 15 minutes, and employees take a few minutes each year to learn about any changes or updates to the integration.
  • Risks.

    Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:

    • The number of employees who support the ongoing integration and maintenance, the time they spend on this, and their salaries.
    • The number employees trained on the integration, the time they spend on training, and their hourly rates.
  • Results.

    To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $99,000.

Ongoing Management And Training Costs

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Employees managing ongoing integration and maintenance of Adobe software with Microsoft Survey 0 3 3 3
E2 Percentage of time allocated to managing ongoing integration Survey 0% 10% 10% 10%
E3 Fully loaded annual salary of an IT employee B4 $0 $120,000 $122,400 $124,800
E4 Ongoing management cost E1*E2*E3 $0 $36,000 $36,720 $37,440
E5 Employees trained on integration C1+C5 0 58 98 133
E6 Time spent training per user (hours) Assumption 0 0.25 0.25 0.25
E7 Average hourly rate of an employee TEI standard $0 $54.00 $55.00 $56.00
E8 Ongoing training cost E5*E6*E7 $0 $783 $1,348 $1,862
Et Ongoing management and training costs E4+E8 $0 $36,783 $38,068 $39,302
Risk adjustment ↑5%
Etr Ongoing management and training costs (risk-adjusted) $0 $38,622 $39,971 $41,267
Three-year total: $119,860 Three-year present value: $99,149

  • icon

    These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

Total costs Total benefits Net benefits

Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted Estimates)

Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($269,237) ($38,622) ($39,971) ($41,267) ($389,097) ($368,386)
Total benefits $0 $433,695 $470,281 $679,656 $1,583,632 $1,293,566
Net benefits ($269,237) $395,073 $430,310 $638,389 $1,194,535 925,180
ROI 251%

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

NEXT SECTIONAppendixes

Appendix A: Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.

Total Economic Impact Approach

  • icon

    Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.

  • icon

    Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.

  • icon

    Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

  • icon

    Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

  • icon
    PRESENT VALUE (PV)

    The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

  • icon
    NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)

    The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

  • icon
    RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI)

    A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

  • icon
    DISCOUNT RATE

    The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

  • icon
    PAYBACK PERIOD

    The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.


Appendix B: Interview And Survey Demographics

Interviews

Role Industry Headquarters Number of Employees Solutions used
Chief digital and information technology officer Biopharmaceutical North America <1,500 Microsoft Office 365, Microsoft Azure, Adobe Analytics, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Connect
Vice president of IT, application engineering and data analytics Digital media North America 10,000 Microsoft Office 365, Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Microsoft Power Platforms, Adobe Analytics, Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Commerce
Chief technology officer Financial services North America 20,000+ Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Power BI Adobe Analytics, Adobe Creative Cloud, Adobe Experience Manager
Chief information and security officer Financial software APAC 5,000+ Microsoft Office 365, Microsoft Azure Adobe Asset Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Creative Cloud
CRM, loyalty, and onboard retail director Global digital and e-commerce directorIT project and delivery director Travel Western Europe 1,500+ Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Adobe Analytics, Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Sensei, Adobe Target

Appendix C: Survey Demographics

demographic

Cookie Preferences

Accept Cookies

A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.

Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.

Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.

Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.