February 2023
Workplaces have become incredibly fragmented with the number of technologies deployed and hybrid approaches to work. Despite efforts to maintain consistent operations, technical hurdles are common, particularly with data access, security of data streams, and alignment of technology workflows for employee collaboration and productivity. CIOs can transform and align IT and business-team operations by investing in compatible solutions and fortifying their data-based foundations.
Microsoft supports native integration with Adobe’s solutions across its platforms. Applications including Adobe Creative Cloud, Adobe Document Cloud, and Adobe Experience Cloud (including Adobe Experience Platform) can be connected and made accessible through Microsoft Azure, Dynamics 365, Microsoft 365, and other services to improve data services, cloud flexibility, and overall security. In fact, Adobe built data applications like Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, and Adobe Journey Optimizer natively on Microsoft Azure to ensure reliable integrations.
Adobe and Microsoft commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by natively integrating their solutions. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of integrating Adobe and Microsoft solutions at their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five business and IT decision-makers and surveyed 52 respondents who have experience managing and using Adobe and Microsoft solutions following integrations at their organizations. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a multinational, industry-agnostic business with 5,000 employees and revenue of $1 billion per year.
Interviewees said that prior to adopting Adobe SaaS solutions and integrating with Microsoft Cloud, their organizations struggled to reconcile information from data streams across their servers into actionable insights for marketing teams. The organizations were in the process of migrating to the cloud, and this led to fragmented data streams between on-prem and cloud servers. Meanwhile, for IT teams, ad hoc content management and marketing solutions required time-consuming custom integrations with their organizations’ on-prem or cloud platforms of choice. These configurations necessitated regular maintenance and oversight from IT staff to avoid outages and security risks. Interviewees said frustrations about these technical challenges made them feel the business potential of their organizations was being held back.
Since investing in Adobe and integrating its SaaS solutions with the Microsoft Cloud, the organizations’ IT teams avoided labor around integrating point solutions with Microsoft. Integrations also did not result in any technical outages, and they protected the security of stored data and files. Data teams derived deeper insights by eliminating data silos and marrying their first-party data on the Microsoft Cloud with behavioral data and other customer experience data from Adobe. Sharing of data and insights was accelerated by apps and services syncing data in real time (e.g., Dynamics 365 with Adobe Commerce), and this helped to accelerate decision-making and activation. As a result, the organizations shortened marketing project timelines while generating stronger results.
Consulting Teams: Corey McNair, Carmen Serradilla Ortiz
Quantified Benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
IT teams save time on deployment of Adobe Experience Cloud to Microsoft Cloud by avoiding building new APIs or connectors to enable integrations. Due to this improvement, the deployment of Adobe SaaS solutions across the composite organization takes less than a month to complete compared to the months it previously would have taken with other on-prem or cloud platforms. IT teams still require additional time to migrate data to the Microsoft Cloud.
Organizational consolidation of data sources under one suite of data solutions provides a stronger foundation, so it rarely loses data and receives it in real time without error. Having enhanced control over data access allows the composite’s IT and security teams more visibility and control over employee access and data sharing, which frees bandwidth for teams to focus on enriching their first-party data with third- party data. The composite organization recognizes $762,000 in value from this increase in productivity over three years.
Having greater visibility and management of data residing in the Microsoft Cloud improves the composite organization’s quality of insights and customer data profiles Adobe tools help produce. The data analysts experience accelerated speed of data analysis by 15% (6 hours weekly). With faster insight delivery, their marketers increase speed of decision-making by 10%.
The organization’s integration of Adobe Document Cloud solutions with Microsoft 365 applications like Outlook and Teams produces incremental time savings of roughly 5 minutes per week for the rest of the organization, which accelerates document productivity.
Unquantified Benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are qualitative or not quantified for this study include:
Interviewees said that as a result of the CIO’s choosing to invest in integrating Adobe and Microsoft, self- service among their organizations’ marketers increased due to greater access to data with fewer mistakes (e.g., overwritten performance results, wrong data uploaded to customer profiles). Teams were able to create more accurate customer profiles and distribute more personalized marketing materials, resulting in greater customer engagement, loyalty, and marketing yield.
Interviewees said now that their organizations’ data is stored in the Microsoft Cloud and directly imported into Adobe solutions, they feel more comfortable about the security of data because there are fewer vulnerabilities. In addition, two- factor authentication and single sign-on support reduced the number of logins and passwords needed, which interviewees felt was valuable in hybrid or remote work environments.
According to interviewees, the integration of Adobe and Microsoft solutions improved the quality of life for their organizations’ employees. They can now complete processes that previously took several steps with just a few clicks. IT teams also recorded fewer incoming support tickets for data requests and fewer complaints from employees around data-management challenges.
The chief digital and information technology officer at a biopharmaceutical organization said Microsoft Azure’s support for worldwide cloud storage, alongside Adobe’s and Microsoft’s support for content distribution networks, helped their company streamline deployment of content and marketing materials on a global level. This reflects Adobe’s and Microsoft’s ability to increase efficiency in the creation, storage, and activation (the content supply chain) of the millions of asset variations needed for personalized customer journeys.
Interviewees at financial services and digital media companies said their organizations reduced their reliance on consultants and contractors around point-solution integration management as a result of the ease of integration with Adobe’s and Microsoft’s native connectors. This change in approach led to cost savings.
Base: 52 decision-makers who have experience using and managing Microsoft and Adobe solutions at their organizations Note: Showing “agree” and “strongly agree.” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft and Adobe, August 2022
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Deployment of Adobe SaaS solutions on Microsoft Cloud only took a few weeks for implementation teams to complete. Adobe Experience Platform and Adobe solutions supporting native integration are integrated within a matter of minutes, whereas other Adobe SaaS solutions take up the majority of implementation work depending on the use case. The migration of data from on-prem servers to the Microsoft Cloud took several months to complete.
Interviewees said small teams dedicated some time toward managing the ongoing integrations and maintenance around Adobe Experience Cloud and Adobe Document Cloud with the Microsoft Cloud. Employees went through brief trainings to learn how to leverage the integrations.
The financial analysis which is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $1.3 million over three years versus costs of $368,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $925,000 and an ROI of 251%.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that the integration of Adobe and Microsoft solutions can have on an organization.
Interviewed Adobe and Microsoft stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to their organizations’ solutions and services.
Interviewed five representatives and surveyed 52 respondents at organizations where Adobe SaaS solutions are integrated with Microsoft services to obtain data with respect to costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A or additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Adobe and Microsoft and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in integrating Adobe solutions with Microsoft services.
Adobe and Microsoft reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Adobe and Microsoft provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third- party survey partner.
Forrester interviewed five decision-makers and surveyed 52 respondents with experience managing and using integrated Adobe and Microsoft solutions at their organizations. For more details on these individuals and the organizations they represent, see Appendix B.
Prior to investing in Adobe SaaS solutions and integrating them with the Microsoft Cloud, interviewees’ and respondents’ organizations relied on a variety of point solutions including customer data platforms (CDPs), cloud management platforms (CMPs), data management platforms (DMPs), customer relationship management (CRM) platforms. These solutions had custom-configured integrations with on-premises and cloud platforms for their data and marketing efforts.
Interviewees and survey respondents noted that their organizations struggled with common challenges from this digital infrastructure approach, including:
Decision-makers created teams, hired external contractors, or brought in consulting companies to help their organizations code or build API connectors when integrating and implementing best-of-breed solutions with their on-prem and cloud platforms. It took months to complete integrations and, since the organizations custom-built the connectors, it would lead to technical setbacks (e.g., outages, broken workflows). These interruptions required time from IT teams to resolve, and they slowed down end users’ productivity.
Interviewees and respondents said their organizations’ tech infrastructures consisted of point solutions from different vendors with first- party data sitting on both on-prem and cloud servers. This made it difficult for IT teams to manage and distribute across teams. Lack of native support for integration between point solutions and Microsoft Azure, as well as with third-party audience data providers, limited the ability of analysts to connect the dots between data to better understand customers and marketing performance. As a result, analysts struggled to personalize marketing and target customers.
IT teams previously selected point solutions based on their capabilities and having the ability to add solutions as needed. However, this created fractured work environments for marketers. A lack of integration between solutions or data flowing between platforms in the cloud meant marketers couldn’t adjust personalized marketing messaging in real time to reflect performance. Passing along performance data took several steps that involved compiling, formatting, and uploading to colleagues. Delayed analysis of performance slowed the ability of teams to iterate on marketing materials and customer journeys. Meanwhile, lack of integration between solutions meant marketers had to send files individually and, depending on size, sharing them could be a slow process.
As a result of technical mishaps that occurred from custom integrations of point solutions with their operating systems as well as individual sharing of files, interviewees said they were uneasy about the security of their organizations’ data and files — especially with some data still residing on on- prem servers. Interviewees said any one of these gaps in the integration could be exploited to successfully attack their organizations’ data centers.
The interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations opted to adopt Adobe SaaS solutions in part because of the strength of their integration with Microsoft services, which helped them address the following objectives:
Pictured right are Microsoft services and Adobe tools most implemented by survey respondents which serve as basis for services and tools deployed by the composite organization.
Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the five interviewees and the 52 survey respondents, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
The composite organization is a multinational, industry-agnostic business that generates $1 billion in annual revenue and has 5,000 total employees. Among the employees, 125 are heavy users of Adobe solutions (e.g., Adobe Commerce, Adobe Asset Manager, Adobe Experience Manager [AEM]) and eight are data analysts who use Adobe analysis solutions (e.g., Adobe Journey Optimizer, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform). The rest of the organization’s employees leverage Adobe Document Cloud solutions. The organization has a single license for each Adobe SaaS solution deployed, and the cost is based on the number of customer profiles and related storage.
The organization moves on from leveraging a set of best-of-breed ad hoc point solutions for marketing, content management, and data analysis and elects to adopt Adobe solutions. Although the composite already had Microsoft applications and solutions in place, they were not integrated with the previous ad hoc point solutions.
Integrating Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft Cloud takes the composite less than a month to complete, and that includes reviewing compatibility, planning, and testing out of integration. The composite integrates all of Adobe’s analytic solutions; Adobe Commerce and Adobe Experience Cloud solutions including Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Experience Manager; and other Adobe solutions. Implementation teams integrate Adobe Experience Platform and other Adobe SaaS solutions with out-of-the-box connectors and Microsoft Cloud within minutes. Depending on the implementation team and use case for apps, other Adobe SaaS solutions take up the bulk of the integration work.
The organization takes several months to migrate and move from data siloes to Microsoft Cloud, and its teams develop best practices to effectively leverage the integrated solutions together over time.
Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atr | Time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with | $144,050 | $0 | $0 | $144,050 | $130,955 |
Btr | Increased productivity of IT/security teams | $204,000 | $312,120 | $424,320 | $940,440 | $762,203 |
Ctr | Value of accelerated data analysis and marketing efforts from integrations | $74,163 | $146,415 | $243,321 | $463,898 | $371,235 |
Dtr | End-user time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | $11,482 | $11,746 | $12,015 | $35,243 | $29,173 |
Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $433,695 | $470,281 | $679,656 | $1,583,632 | $1,293,566 |
Interviewees and survey respondents said Microsoft’s native connectors for Adobe solutions helped their organizations’ IT teams circumvent hours of work when deploying Adobe solutions on Microsoft Cloud for it to host them. Workers avoided needing to build APIs or connectors to integrate solutions like they previously did to establish data sharing and workflows with prior point solutions because of Microsoft’s support for Adobe solutions.
Beyond building out integration support, Adobe solutions running on Microsoft Azure mitigated time spent reviewing and adjusting configurations, including basic networking around firewall and network IP addresses to security server protection. Although migrating data from storage silos to the cloud still required effort from IT teams, the chief digital and information technology officer at the biopharmaceutical organization shared that their company got Adobe software up and running on Microsoft Azure within a matter of hours.
The vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics at a digital media company noted that without their organization’s E3 license Microsoft 365, the company would have worked with up to 10 different security vendors to achieve the same level of protection. Specifically, this approach would have required configurations across each security solution, the use of different engineers with different skill sets, and time from them to set up the configurations. Between Adobe and Microsoft, only one team was responsible for integrations per region, and it ensured deployment of Adobe solutions onto Microsoft Cloud services was consistent.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $131,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | FTEs tasked with deployment of Adobe solutions | Interviews | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
A2 | Months spent on deployment of comparable solutions before Adobe (weeks | Interviews | 26 | 0 | 0 | ||
A3 | Percentage of time dedicated to deployment | Interviews | 30% | 0% | 0% | ||
A4 | Improvement with Adobe deployment | Interviews/survey | 90% | 0% | 0% | ||
A5 | Subtotal: Time saved with Adobe integration | A1*(A2*40)*A3*A4 | 2,808 | 0 | 0 | ||
A6 | Average fully loaded hourly rate of a deployment employee | TEI standard | $57 | $0 | $0 | ||
At | Time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | A5*A6 | $160,056 | $0 | $0 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||||
Atr | Time savings from integration of Adobe Atr SaaS solutions with Microsoft (risk-adjusted) | $144,050 | $0 | $0 | |||
Three-year total: $144,050 | Three-year present value: $130,955 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
IT and security teams at interviewee’s organizations continued to experience productivity enhancements in the day-to-day maintenance and management of solutions. Integrations between Adobe and Microsoft solutions were reliable and ensured Adobe Journey Optimizer, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, and Adobe Real- Time CDP received data in real time without errors.
Decision-makers said their organizations eliminated broken data and workflows that appeared too frequently with previous custom-configuration approaches. IT teams reallocated time spent reworking and conducting maintenance on prior configurations toward identifying opportunities to bring in third-party data to Adobe data platforms to enrich first-party data for more complete customer profiles.
The consolidation of data sources under one suite further supported shifting time spent from technology toward data enhancement, and the organizations removed work related to compiling information across silos for upload to customer management platforms and data management platforms. The organizations rarely lost or accidentally overwrote data, which helped IT teams reduce recovery work. As a whole,decision-makers said combining Microsoft Azure with Adobe’s data platforms made for stronger foundations upon which their organizations could dependably draw insights.
This data foundation also helped security teams avoid time spent monitoring various security solutions that supported the security of data stored within on- prem servers. These time savings multiplied based on the number of security solutions the organizations leveraged to support prior ad hoc point solutions.
Through the Adobe and Microsoft integration, interviewees said security teams gained greater control over data access. Teams set consistent parameters for data sharing and ensured teams had access to only the data that they needed, which minimized risk of data exposure and the fallout of work that can come from that.
IT teams gained more control and visibility of employee access to Adobe solutions through Microsoft Azure, ensuring users had the most up-to- date applications. The organizations also recognized incremental time savings by providing access to Adobe solutions through Azure Active Directory, and they added devices with access to their directories for single sign-on services. This eliminated time required to distribute licenses to individual users.
These efficiencies added up for IT teams. Ninety percent of survey respondents said integrating Adobe’s Experience Cloud solutions with Microsoft reduced the amount of technical work for their organizations’ developers or engineers. Among respondents whose organizations saw a reduction, 16.2% said their company reduced technical work each month after integration.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $762,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | IT/security staff tasked with integrating and maintaining software infrastructure before adopting Adobe | Interviews | 20 | 20 | 20 | ||
B2 | Percentage of IT and security staff reallocated since adopting Adobe (cumulative) | Interviews | 10% | 15% | 20% | ||
B3 | Subtotal: Reallocated staff | B1*B2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
B4 | Average annual fully loaded salary of an IT/security employee | TEI standard | $120,000 | $122,400 | $124,800 | ||
Bt | Increased productivity of IT/security teams | B3*B4 | $240,000 | $367,200 | $499,200 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||||
Btr | Increased productivity of IT/security teams (risk-adjusted) | $204,000 | $312,120 | $424,320 | |||
Three-year total: $940,440 | Three-year present value: $762,203 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
According to interviewees, the value of the combined power of Adobe solutions and Microsoft services extended beyond IT to business decision-makers and business results. Specifically, the speed that data analysts and marketers could share, review, and act on data increased significantly.
By storing data within Microsoft Azure, the organizations’ data analysts no longer needed to sort between various data stacks or third-party data sources to cross-reference to derive insights. Rather, with a single data lake, they were able to complete analyses on broader swaths of data sets in one location. Having greater visibility over data enabled data analysts to assemble more complete customer- data profiles for more personalized marketing messaging.
Analysts leveraged this data in real time with the support of prebuilt connectors between Adobe and Microsoft. They pulled in performance data from various use cases like Adobe Experience Manager sites directly to their companies’ data lakes in Microsoft Azure, immediately analyzed the data with Adobe Real-Time CDP and then automated adding the information to customer profiles to trigger more personalized marketing and engagement tactics. Data teams no longer needed to wait on IT teams to extract and format data to analyze because it became a seamless experience that accelerated data analysis.
These insights extended beyond automating personalized messaging toward sharing insights across marketing teams to review their overall marketing approaches and accelerate decision- making speeds. Interviewees said through Adobe Analytics and Adobe Customer Journey Analytics connector with Power BI, data could be directly loaded into Power BI for analysts to create reports and visualizations to distribute with marketing leaders.
Simplicity around formatting data imported to Power BI increased self-service for even marketers to assist in the work. The chief digital and information technology officer at a biopharmaceutical company estimated their organization’s marketing teams saved as much as 5 hours per week in receiving new reports to act upon. They said the speed with which data could be shared since integrating with Microsoft increased the frequency in which marketing teams ran A/B tests on content and marketing material. While not integrated with Azure, real-time reporting on the organization’s A/B tests increased marketers’ usage of Adobe Target.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $406,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Data analysts who use Adobe SaaS solutions | Composite | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||
C2 | Increase in speed of analysis through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | Interviews/survey | 10.0% | 12.5% | 15% | |||
C3 | Average annual fully loaded salary of a data analyst | TEI standard | $115,000 | $117,300 | $119,600 | |||
C4 | Subtotal: Value from increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | C1*C2*C3 | $92,000 | $117,300 | $143,520 | |||
C5 | Employees who work on content with Adobe SaaS solutions | Composite | 50 | 90 | 125 | |||
C6 | Percentage of work time spent with Adobe SaaS solutions | Assumption | 30% | 30% | 30% | |||
C7 | Increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | Interviews/survey | 5% | 7.5% | 10% | |||
C8 | Average annual fully loaded salary ofa marketer | TEI standard | $110,000 | $112,200 | $114,400 | |||
C9 | Subtotal: Value from increase in speed of analysis through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | C5*C6*C7*C8 | $82,500 | $227,205 | $429,000 | |||
C10 | Productivity recapture | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
Ct | Value of accelerated data analysis and marketing efforts from integrations | (C4+C9)*C10 | $87,250 | $172,253 | $286,260 | |||
Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||||
Ctr | Value of accelerated data analysis and marketing efforts from integrations (risk-adjusted) | $74,163 | $146,415 | $243,321 | ||||
Three-year total: $463,898 | Three-year present value: $371,235 | |||||||
View More
View Less
|
Across interviewees’ and respondents’ organizations, individual users saw incremental time savings with Adobe Document Cloud solutions integrated into Microsoft 365 applications like Outlook, SharePoint, and Teams. Employees could open Adobe PDFs within an email or SharePoint without opening Adobe Acrobat or Reader.
They could also collaborate on document creation in real time through Teams and receive e-signatures through its integration with Adobe Acrobat Sign. While, this led to an overall small amount of time savings, the improvement contributed to stronger employee experiences.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $29,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | End users interacting with Adobe SaaS solutions (excluding employees already accounted for) | Composite | 7,422 | 7,382 | 7,347 | |||
D2 | Increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft (five minutes per week) | Interviews | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||
D3 | Increased productivity with Adobe and Microsoft integration (hours) | D1*D2*52 weeks | 772 | 768 | 764 | |||
D4 | Fully loaded hourly rate for an end user | TEI standard | $35 | $36 | $37 | |||
D5 | Value from increase in speed of work through integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | D3*D4 | $27,016 | $27,638 | $28,271 | |||
D6 | Productivity recapture | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
Dt | End-user time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft | D5*D6 | $13,508 | $13,819 | $14,136 | |||
Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||||
Dtr | End-user time savings from integration of Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft (risk-adjusted) | $11,482 | $11,746 | $12,015 | ||||
Three-year total: $35,243 | Three-year present value: $29,173 | |||||||
View More
View Less
|
Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but did not quantify:
Increased data sharing since the integrations enabled teams to iterate more quickly on marketing material and personalize content in real time to draw stronger engagement with customers. The chief information and security officer in the financial software industry said their organization has seen a 20% improvement in marketing yield since integrating Adobe Experience Cloud solutions with Microsoft Azure and Power BI.
Specifically, the interviewee attributed the benefit to a reduction in human error around the uploading of data to the wrong customer profiles or losing performance results to data being overwritten. With data flowing correctly, they had bandwidth to focus more on the creative process and testing material to come up with more compelling content.
Among survey respondents, 75% agreed that since integrating Adobe Experience Cloud with Microsoft Cloud, their organizations decreased the amount of time needed to create and execute digital customer experiences. Meanwhile, 57% of respondents indicated their organization saw an improvement in KPIs since integration. The biggest gain was in customer sentiment (e.g., Net Promoter Score℠) or customer loyalty at 45%.
This result aligned with interviewees speaking to data-driven enhancements to customer experiences for greater personalization. The vice president of IT, application engineering, and data analytics at a digital media organization said: “If you have the integration, there’s strong promise to achieve better business results and turnaround time. ... We can be more agile and bring more real-time customer insight. With Power BI and Adobe data, we can visualize what type of content our customers consume [and] on what device and personalize for [them] based on that.”
Interviewees said that along with relieving security staff of some work effort since integrating Adobe and Microsoft, security teams felt their companies’ files and data were more protected. Having data stored in the Microsoft Cloud and imported directly into solutions with native connectors reduced the number of outside solutions or custom configurations with potential vulnerabilities in which data traveled around the company. While the organizations still employed other security solutions, interviewees said their organizations’ data and files specific to Adobe had not experienced any compromises. Meanwhile, two-factor authentication support and single sign-on support with Microsoft for Adobe solutions reduced the number of logins and passwords floating around at companies for access. Interviewees felt this was particularly valuable with the amount of remote work and opportunities for attack occurring today.
Interviewees said their organizations’ workers appreciated the time savings created by the integration of Adobe and Microsoft solutions, and they welcomed the ease of use to leverage the integrations. The integrations made use cases intuitive — from a few clicks through Power BI for pulling up Adobe Analytics and/or Adobe Customer Journey Analytics data to sharing first- and third-party data back to Adobe Campaign or Adobe Experience Cloud to build customer profiles. Interviewees said another indicator of ease of use was seeing fewer support tickets related to data requests sent to IT and, as a result, there were fewer complaints from employees around difficulties with managing data.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might integrate Adobe and Microsoft solutions and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Like Adobe solutions, Microsoft Azure offers support for content distribution networks (CDNs). The chief digital and information technology officer at a biopharmaceutical company said Azure’s global footprint and cloud storage enabled their organization to leverage Adobe solutions alongside CDNs to disburse content and marketing materials worldwide. Previously, this would have required a devoted server for transferring assets and data alongside hours of time, depending on the file size.
Interviewees at the financial services and digital media organizations said their technical teams leaned on consultancies and contractors to integrate and manage configurations between their point solutions and Microsoft Cloud before adopting Adobe solutions. The organizations reduced their reliance on these consulting services with the ease of integration through Adobe and Microsoft’s native connectors. Survey respondents said their organizations decreased agency spend for technical support by an average of 15.2% since integration.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A ).
Ref. | Costs | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dtr | Implementation and migration costs | $269,237 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $269,237 | $269,237 |
Ftr | Ongoing management and training costs | $0 | $38,622 | $39,971 | $41,267 | $119,860 | $99,149 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $269,237 | $38,622 | $39,971 | $41,267 | $389,097 | $368,386 |
With the native connectors between Adobe and Microsoft, interviewees said deployment of Adobe solutions on Microsoft Cloud only took a few weeks for their organizations’ implementation teams to complete. Teams still reviewed compatibility of solutions with their networks and ran tests to make sure workflows operated smoothly. For Adobe Experience Platform and other SaaS solutions supporting native integration with Microsoft Cloud, they are integrated within a matter of minutes. Meanwhile, depending on the use case, other Adobe SaaS solutions take up the bulk of planning and testing work.
The most time-consuming portion of the migration was moving data from on-prem servers to the Microsoft Cloud. According to interviewees this took upwards of six months to complete.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three- year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $269,000.
Ref | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | FTEs involved in integration of Adobe software with Microsoft | Interviews | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D2 | Time spent on integration (weeks) | Interviews/survey | 2.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D3 | Fully loaded hourly rate of an employee | A6 | $57 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D4 | Cost of integration | D1*E2*E3*40hour week | $16,416 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D5 | FTEs involved in migrating data and sites over to Microsoft Cloud | Interviews | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D6 | Time spent migrating data and sites to Microsoft Cloud (weeks) | Interviews | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D7 | Hourly rate of an employee | B4/2,080 hours | $58 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D8 | Cost of migration to cloud | E5*E6*37*40 hours per week | $240,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Dt | Implementation and migration costs | D4+D8 | $256,416 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑5% | ||||||
Dtr | Implementation and migration costs (risk- adjusted) | $269,237 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Three-year total: $269,237 | Three-year present value: $269,237 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Interviewees said their organizations had small teams responsible for managing the ongoing integration and maintenance around Adobe SaaS solutions with Microsoft Cloud and that ongoing maintenance accounted for a small portion of their time.
After the migration, data analysts and content/marketing staff members were trained how to effectively leverage data. Training took minutes for employees to complete because it consisted of intuitive navigation.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Differences in organizations that may impact the benefit results include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $99,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Employees managing ongoing integration and maintenance of Adobe software with Microsoft | Survey | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
E2 | Percentage of time allocated to managing ongoing integration | Survey | 0% | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
E3 | Fully loaded annual salary of an IT employee | B4 | $0 | $120,000 | $122,400 | $124,800 | |
E4 | Ongoing management cost | E1*E2*E3 | $0 | $36,000 | $36,720 | $37,440 | |
E5 | Employees trained on integration | C1+C5 | 0 | 58 | 98 | 133 | |
E6 | Time spent training per user (hours) | Assumption | 0 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
E7 | Average hourly rate of an employee | TEI standard | $0 | $54.00 | $55.00 | $56.00 | |
E8 | Ongoing training cost | E5*E6*E7 | $0 | $783 | $1,348 | $1,862 | |
Et | Ongoing management and training costs | E4+E8 | $0 | $36,783 | $38,068 | $39,302 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑5% | ||||||
Etr | Ongoing management and training costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $38,622 | $39,971 | $41,267 | ||
Three-year total: $119,860 | Three-year present value: $99,149 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($269,237) | ($38,622) | ($39,971) | ($41,267) | ($389,097) | ($368,386) |
Total benefits | $0 | $433,695 | $470,281 | $679,656 | $1,583,632 | $1,293,566 |
Net benefits | ($269,237) | $395,073 | $430,310 | $638,389 | $1,194,535 | 925,180 |
ROI | 251% | |||||
View More
View Less
|
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Role | Industry | Headquarters | Number of Employees | Solutions used |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chief digital and information technology officer | Biopharmaceutical | North America | <1,500 | Microsoft Office 365, Microsoft Azure, Adobe Analytics, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Connect |
Vice president of IT, application engineering and data analytics | Digital media | North America | 10,000 | Microsoft Office 365, Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Microsoft Power Platforms, Adobe Analytics, Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Commerce |
Chief technology officer | Financial services | North America | 20,000+ | Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Power BI Adobe Analytics, Adobe Creative Cloud, Adobe Experience Manager |
Chief information and security officer | Financial software | APAC | 5,000+ | Microsoft Office 365, Microsoft Azure Adobe Asset Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Creative Cloud |
CRM, loyalty, and onboard retail director Global digital and e-commerce directorIT project and delivery director | Travel | Western Europe | 1,500+ | Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Adobe Analytics, Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Sensei, Adobe Target |
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.