September 2022
The strategic value of product information has become clearer due to the expansion of online selling. Product information completeness and quality combined with automated integration enables selling expansion into new sales channels, channel expansion, broadening customer bases, and faster adjustments to market changes. Akeneo’s product information management solution enables these outcomes while providing product manager productivities that lead to retention improvements and value-add work.
Akeneo's Product Information Management (PIM) solution provides a single source of truth for product data, complete with asset management, omnichannel product activation capabilities like syndication, and data onboarding and management capabilities. It has an easy-to-use interface and administrative workflows that save on administrative time; promote accuracy and completeness of product information; and facilitate internal product information sharing. Through available APIs, product data can be automatically shared with internal and external systems, such as e-commerce, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, warehouse management systems (WMS), and customer relationship management (CRM) systems, as well as with sales and marketing channels, and third-party retailers and distributors. Resulting improvements to product quality, product completeness, labor activities, and system-to-system communications leads to significant revenue increases, reduced product returns, and employee retention improvements.
Akeneo commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Akeneo’s PIM solution.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Akeneo’s PIM solution on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four representatives with experience using the Product Information Management solution. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a brand manufacturer that directly and indirectly sells its products and associated accessories and supplies, with 200,000 stock keeping units (SKUs) and revenue of $500 million per year.
Prior to using Akeneo’s PIM solution, the interviewees noted how their organizations lacked a single source of product information, which led to data and labor redundancy, data accuracy issues, and information sharing challenges. The interviewees also shared that they lacked proper workflow management, governance, automation, and APIs to effectively provide efficient and effective product data management, ensure product data completeness, minimize product data errors, and optimize timely data sharing with internal systems as well as marketing and selling partners.
After the investment in Akeneo’s PIM solution, the interviewees’ organizations centralized their product information within Akeneo while providing workflows to save administrative time, ensure completeness, optimize quality, and automate feeds to internal systems as well as to distributors and retailers. Revenue improvements from the investment in Akeneo included more sales and fewer returns due to the completeness and accuracy of data available during the online purchase process; improvements to retailer site visibility and prioritization due to product information improvements; channel expansion due to Akeneo APIs; cross-selling and upselling due to better product-to-product associations; and more new product introductions due to product managers’ time shifting to more value-add work.
Consulting Team: Eric Hall
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
The ability to centrally store and manage all product information allows the composite organization to improve the experience for managing data and supports better insight into data quality. This also allows the composite to supply all sales channels more easily with rich, search-engine-optimized (SEO) product information that leads to improved product performance on partner sites. Lastly, the composite organization better links and manages product relationships to generate additional cross- and upsell revenue.
Ambiguous product information is one of the top reasons customers return online purchases. By improving product information completeness and quality using Akeneo, the composite organization experiences a reduction of returns, incurring operational savings related to the shipping and handling costs of the returns as well as any discounting or write-offs associated with the returned items.
Akeneo’s flexible data model enables the composite organization to activate targeted selling through more channels, easily expand presence to new channels, and improve the ability to target customers. The composite organization expands its channel breadth to increase its global presence and pivot its product activation capabilities based on changing market dynamics (such as those caused by the COVID-19 pandemic) to reach more audiences with relevant content.
The composite organization expands products sold and facilitates new product adoption sooner due to improved TTM. In addition, product manager productivities lead to more value-add work, which includes more new products as well as more innovative products. Distributors gained a competitive advantage by providing more complete, accurate information.
The shift from unproductive product information work to value-add work, such as new product management, channel expansion, etc., improves product manager retention.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified in this study include:
Two interviewees shared that they had no product information challenges associated when the Akeneo implementation was followed by an e-commerce platform change.
Interviewees shared that they integrated Akeneo with both product information sources and destinations.
Interviewees noted that Akeneo allowed them to ensure completeness by requiring certain fields being populated, correctly formatted data, etc.
Interviewees spoke of having positive feelings of a partnership with Akeneo even before they signed a contract and that partnership held true.
Interviewees were impressed with Akeneo partners from the time they first met with them until project completion.
Interviewees shared that the strong system integration capabilities of Akeneo combined with data completeness helped ensure that government regulations are met.
The combination of Akeneo’s ease-of-use and the ability to feed multiple systems has enabled people across the entire organization to have access to the timely, thorough, and accurate product data to their job effectively.
Costs.
Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include implementation, training, and licensing costs of $1.2 million over three years. The Akeneo PIM solution has a base price with additional costs for users, SKUs, and other add-ons. Implementation includes Akeneo professional services, Akeneo integrator consulting, and customer resources, such as IT, product managers, project managers, etc.
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $5.71 million over three years versus costs of $1.23 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $4.49 million and an ROI of 365%.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that the Akeneo Product Information Management solution can have on an organization.
Interviewed Akeneo stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to the Product Information Management solution.
Interviewed four representatives at organizations using the Akeneo Product Information Management solution to obtain data with respect to costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Akeneo and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in the Akeneo Product Information Management Solution.
Akeneo reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Akeneo provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Role | Industry | Region | Annual revenue |
---|---|---|---|
Digital customer experience (CX) manager | Manufacturer with B2B and B2C | Global | $2 billion |
IT director | Specialty product distributor | North America | $100 million |
Director of digital and e-commerce marketing | Consumer electronics distributor | North America | $300 million |
VP marketing, e-commerce, and customer experience | Machinery and parts manufacturer | Global | $200 million |
Prior to investing in Akeneo, none of the interviewees’ companies had a modern enterprise PIM or single source for product data. The product data that they did have had quality and completeness issues, and over 25% of the product data wasn’t shared effectively. Interviewees also spoke of product management time constraints and technical shortcomings that limited channels for selling, product sales within certain channels, and selling approaches, such as cross-selling, upselling, and ranking.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Typically, some data was stored in the ERP system or a legacy product information management system, and users faced constraints on available fields, field sizes, product categorizations, and organizing product data for intended product data users. As a result, multiple departments had different parts of product records. The use of spreadsheets as a work-around was common. Duplicate effort occurred in maintaining the data and excess effort occurred accessing the data. Ensuring data quality was not possible, so inaccurate input was not caught and departments frequently had common data that conflicted.
Interviewees described how product managers spent a large amount of their time on inefficient activities collecting and managing product data, which in turn led to inefficient activities to activate that data with channel partners or with their own catalogs and e-commerce system.
Interviewees shared that they lacked the combination of resources, technical skills, and nimbleness to respond to many market opportunities. This hampered their ambitions to expand selling channels, the number of products sold through various channels, and improved sales approaches, such as upselling, cross-selling, selling by product groupings, and product rankings.
Another technical limitation was distributors losing new product placement opportunities by being beaten by competitors in providing new product information to retailers and e-commerce partners.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
The composite organization is a product manufacturer, averaging $500 million in revenue. It sells its own products alongside a collection of other brands' products. The composite organization has a strong brand, global sales in English only, and sells through its catalog, e-commerce site, brick-and-mortar retailers, and a few online retailers.
More than 50% of the product data is available in the ERP system with the remainder of the product data dispersed across organizations, mostly in spreadsheets. The composite organization has 12 product managers responsible for 200,000 SKUs. The number of SKUs sold within each sales channel is limited by product manager time constraints and technology limitations.
Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atr | Margin increase due to Akeneo-enabled data management and quality improvements | $892,500 | $1,093,313 | $1,311,975 | $3,297,788 | $2,700,634 |
Btr | Operational improvements through return reduction due to quality and decision accuracy | $425,000 | $446,250 | $468,563 | $1,339,813 | $1,107,203 |
Ctr | Margin increase due to revenue improvement associated with new market opportunities | $420,000 | $514,500 | $617,400 | $1,551,900 | $1,270,887 |
Dtr | Margin increase due to increased time-to-market and productivities | $210,000 | $235,200 | $262,395 | $707,595 | $582,431 |
Etr | Product manager retention improvement due to employee experience improvement | $21,600 | $21,600 | $21,600 | $64,800 | $53,716 |
Total Benefits | $1,969,100 | $2,310,863 | $2,681,933 | $6,961,895 | $5,714,871 |
Interviewees’ organizations used Akeneo to realize the foundational value of PIM — the ability to manage product information that was reliable and complete. Organizations experienced an increase in direct sales because this improved data quality allowed end customers to gain a better understanding of products, increasing the likelihood of purchase, and because major retailers frequently prioritized their product displays based upon completeness scores. Key components included:
Interviewees used Akeneo as a single source of the truth for product information and enrichment tailored to their customer needs while also minimizing errors, therefore improving customer satisfaction and increasing sales.
The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing highlighted the ability to automatically share the centrally maintained product information with all the sales channels as a key benefit, noting, “We are supplying the appropriate information to all of our selling channels.” The specialty product distributor’s IT director described the importance of the quality and completeness improvements to meet varied channel requirements, stating: “Providing the right content is very important to selling, especially for the cases where some people are really specialized on what they are doing so they really need to know all the details before purchasing the items. Akeneo provided us with the processes to ensure that customers get the details that they need to convince them to purchase our products vs. others. We have seen an increase in competition in our space, but we have had an increase in positive customer feedback and in business since using Akeneo.”
Interviewees shared that their organizations improved their product completeness and quality rating, creating revenue improvements with improved product placements when activating their product information with major retailers and online ecommerce sites. The machinery and parts manufacturer’s VP of marketing, e-commerce, and customer experience said: “Our product information at a major online retailer was terrible. With Akeneo we organized our product data into up to 10 features that flow into the retailer’s site. We turned our product experience around to be an A+. Our order rate has gone up 37% and our revenue has gone up by over $10 million. This was not a possibility before. We have also seen significant sales increases at our major retailers.”
Akeneo connected the customer with accessories and supplies directly associated with a product as well as other products that were commonly used with the viewed product, driving additional revenue.
Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization:
Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.7 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Annual revenue without Akeneo (5% growth) | Composite | $500,000,000 | $525,000,000 | $551,250,000 | ||
A2 | Increased revenue directly related to significant improvements in data management and quality improvement | Interviews | 1.50% | 1.75% | 2.00% | ||
A3 | Cross-sell and upsell due to product relationships and quality improvements driven rankings | Interviews | 1.50% | 1.75% | 2.00% | ||
A4 | Subtotal: Increased revenue due to Akeneo | (A1+A2)*A3 | $15,000,000 | $18,375,000 | $22,050,000 | ||
A5 | Operating margin | TEI standard | 7% | 7% | 7% | ||
At | Margin increase due to Akeneo-enabled data management and quality improvements | A4*A5 | $1,050,000 | $1,286,250 | $1,543,500 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||||
Atr | Margin increase due to Akeneo-enabled data management and quality improvements (risk-adjusted) | $892,500 | $1,093,313 | $1,311,975 | |||
Three-year revenue total: $55,425,000 | Three-year revenue present value: $45,388,805 | ||||||
Three-year margin total: $3,297,788 | Three-year margin present value: $2,700,634 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
In addition to additional revenue, the improvement in quality and completeness of product information also led to a significant reduction in product returns. Product returns rose in parallel with the rise of online sales. After implementing Akeneo, the interviewees’ organizations noted a reduction in returns, leading to a variety of benefits, including:
Interviewees noted that some returns can’t be avoided but they described the most significant reason for returns was that the product wasn’t what they expected from the online information provided.
Interviewees said that all returns have some combination of shipping and handling cost that their organizations must pay. These costs were typically over $10 per product and could be over a thousand dollars for some items.
Interviewees shared that reselling returned products requires discounting approximately 10% to 25% of the time. Discounting may be required due to repackaging changes, product damage, product obsolescence, or product seasonality.
Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization:
Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $1.1 million.
Ref | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Annual revenue without Akeneo (5% growth) | Composite | $500,000,000 | $525,000,000 | $551,250,000 | ||
B2 | Historical returns as a percentage of sales | Assumption | 10% | 10% | 10% | ||
B3 | Reduction in returns due to product content improvements | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | ||
B4 | Subtotal: Revenue associated with returns | B1*B2*B3 | $10,000,000 | $10,500,000 | $11,025,000 | ||
B5 | Shipping and handling cost as percentage of revenue | Assumption | 3% | 3% | 3% | ||
B6 | Subtotal: Reduction in shipping and handling cost of returns | B4*B5 | $300,000 | $315,000 | $330,750 | ||
B7 | Discount of returns as percentage of revenue | Interviews | 2% | 2% | 2% | ||
B8 | Subtotal: Reduction in lost margin due to returns | B4*B7 | $200,000 | $210,000 | $220,500 | ||
Bt | Operational improvements through return reduction due to quality and decision accuracy | B6+B8 | $500,000 | $525,000 | $551,250 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||||
Btr | Operational improvements through return reduction due to quality and decision accuracy (risk-adjusted) | $425,000 | $446,250 | $468,563 | |||
Three-year total: $1,339,813 | Three-year present value: $1,107,203 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Beyond process and operational improvements enabled through better product information management support, interviewees’ organizations were better equipped to take advantage of new market opportunities. Interviewees shared that they utilized Akeneo’s connectors to adjacent software, automation of key data management processes, flexible taxonomies, and translation capabilities to expand their market presence. Interviewees’ companies have seen revenue increases due to omnichannel expansion, global market expansion, the ability to target new customer types, and the ability to have their products understood by a broader audience. Key components include:
Automation capabilities and APIs that support simplified integration with channels, allowed the interviewees’ organizations to sell through more channels, and quickly adapt as new opportunities emerge. The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing said, “I don’t even want to think about doing B2C without Akeneo.”
Interviewees spoke of their organizations’ ability to expand sales to less sophisticated consumers than they had historically because the information was provided to find their products in searches and understand the products well enough to make informed purchasing decisions. The VP marketing, e-commerce, and customer experience at the machinery and parts manufacturer said, “Our success in expanding our marketing and sales to direct customers sales benefited from our use of Akeneo.”
Interviewees have utilized Akeneo’s flexible support of various product categories to create specific taxonomies to target both existing customers and new. During the pandemic, interviewees spoke of adjustments that supported consumers that had to shift from in-store viewings of products to online viewings. Others expanded sales to the general population of pandemic-related products that historically sold only to hospitals, laboratories, and facilities management facilities
Interviewees also used Akeneo’s translation capability to expand their organizations’ geographic selling footprint by supporting multiple languages. The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing shared that, utilizing Akeneo’s translation capability, they have expanded from North America to three additional continents.
Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization:
Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $1.3 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Annual revenue without Akeneo (5% growth) | Composite | $500,000,000 | $525,000,000 | $551,250,000 | ||
C2 | Increased revenue due to omnichannel and global expansion | Interviews | 1.50% | 1.75% | 2.00% | ||
C3 | Subtotal: Increased revenue due to Akeneo | C1*C2 | $7,500,000 | $9,187,500 | $11,025,000 | ||
C4 | Operating margin | TEI standard | 7% | 7% | 7% | ||
Ct | Margin increase due to revenue improvement associated with new market opportunities | C3*C4 | $525,000 | $643,125 | $771,750 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓20% | ||||||
Ctr | Margin increase due to revenue improvement associated with new market opportunities (risk-adjusted) | $420,000 | $514,500 | $617,400 | |||
Three-year revenue total: $27,712,500 | Three-year revenue present value: $22,694,403 | ||||||
Three-year margin total: $1,551,900 | Three-year margin present value: $1,270,887 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Interviewees spoke of Akeneo’s numerous roles in driving revenue through time-to-market (TTM) improvements, labor productivities, and the combination thereof. First, adoption of Akeneo’s workflows shortened the time to release new products or provide product updates to distributors and online selling sites. With less time spent on low-value tasks, interviewees also noted that the productivity gains for product managers translated to them being able to take on more high-value work, including developing new products. Interviewees noted that:
The two interviewees in manufacturing shared that Akeneo-related product information workflow improvements led to a TTM improvement. This, combined with Akeneo-related product information improvements, made their sellers and resellers sell more of their products. The machinery and parts manufacturer’s VP marketing, e-commerce, and customer experience shared: “We now provide our largest distributors with updated data daily and the same timing for a distributor portal for our other 500 distributors. The quality, thoroughness, and timeliness of product data has led to business growth due to distributors expanding to more products and adopting new products sooner.”
The two interviewees from distributors described obtaining a competitive advantage by providing their retailers with product much quicker than in the past. Their organizations not only meet or exceed the retailers’ accurate and complete product information requirements, but the distributors provide that information consistently sooner than competitors. The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing described the before and after TTM impact this way: “We sell to a bunch of different retailers. With Akeneo, it typically takes us a day or two at most to fully enrich a product and have it ready to go to our different customer sites to all sales channels. Before Akeneo, that could be a week, two weeks, or longer depending on the product and our relationship with the vendor who is supplying the product.”
The manufacturer interviewees also spoke of another benefit of the time saved by no longer doing menial tasks, product managers were able to focus on new products, and, frequently, new innovative products. Previously, the time spent on developing new products was limited due to time constraints. After Akeneo was implemented, the product managers had more time to focus on new products, which led to additional revenues and improved employee satisfaction.
Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization:
Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $582,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | Annual revenue without Akeneo (5% growth) | Composite | $500,000,000 | $525,000,000 | $551,250,000 | ||
D2 | Increased revenue due product development acceleration and innovation due to increase in product manager focus time | Interviews | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.29% | ||
D3 | Increased revenue due to ability to add more products, TTM to distributors, and TTM by distributors | Interviews | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | ||
D4 | Subtotal: Increased revenue due to increased TTM and productivities | (D1+D3)*D2 | $3,750,000 | $4,200,000 | $4,685,625 | ||
D5 | Operating margin | TEI standard | 7% | 7% | 7% | ||
Dt | Margin increase due to increased time-to-market and productivities | D4*D5 | $262,500 | $294,000 | $327,994 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓20% | ||||||
Dtr | Margin increase due to increased time-to-market and productivities (risk-adjusted) | $210,000 | $235,200 | $262,395 | |||
Three-year revenue total: $12,635,625 | Three-year revenue present value: $10,400,545 | ||||||
Three-year margin total: $707,595 | Three-year margin present value: $582,431 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Interviewees had a major unexpected benefit of product managers’ job satisfaction improving because of the Akeneo implementation, which led to employee retention improvements. By reducing the menial work, product managers were able to do more interesting, valuable work. This made them happier in general and more proud of their work product.The machinery and parts manufacturer’s VP marketing, e-commerce, and customer experience shared: “Prior to Akeneo we experienced quite a bit of product manager turnover. We haven’t had any turnover in product management since we implemented Akeneo, which is even more impressive considering labor issues these days.”
Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization.
Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $54,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Number of product managers | Composite | 12 | 12 | 12 | ||
E2 | Percentage turnover reduction | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | ||
E3 | Percentage of reduction associated with Akeneo | Assumption | 75% | 75% | 75% | ||
E4 | Reduction in turnover (FTE) | E1*E2*E3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||
E5 | Cost of recruiting, training, etc. per employee | Assumption | $15,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 | ||
Et | Employee retention improvement due to employee experience improvement | E4*E5 | $27,000 | $27,000 | $27,000 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓20% | ||||||
Etr | Employee retention improvement due to employee experience improvement (risk-adjusted) | $21,600 | $21,600 | $21,600 | |||
Three-year total: $64,800 | Three-year present value: $53,716 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Additional benefits that customers experienced but were not able to quantify include:
The interviewees from the specialty product distributor and the consumer electronics distributor both said that having Akeneo already implemented made their organizations’ e-commerce platform change easier, allowing them to focus on non-PIM-related challenges. The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing said: “We changed our e-commerce platform since implementing Akeneo and that simplified things. There were no issues with the transition at all from a PIM standpoint. There was already a connector between Akeneo and our new e-commerce system, so switching over was more or less just pointing our Akeneo API to the e-commerce connector.”
Interviewees spoke of integrating Akeneo with multiple platforms, both upstream and downstream. Integrated platforms include product lifecycle management (PLM) systems, ERP systems, CRM systems, WMS, digital asset management (DAM) systems, marketing automation platforms, distributor portals, and e-commerce systems. The product information shared reduced data collection and sharing efforts while improving accuracy and timeliness.
Interviewees noted that Akeneo made it possible to require that certain fields be populated, and other attributes be correctly formatted, allowing them to ensure completeness. The Data Quality Insights capability was a feature that some interviewees wished that they used earlier.
All interviewees spoke positively about working with Akeneo and the company’s commitment to ensuring success. The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing summed it up well: “We have a great relationship with Akeneo. They’ve always been extremely responsive and helpful to us. They’re probably our best software vendor to work with from a responsiveness point of view and taking issues to heart and making change, that sort of thing. In fact, I think they’re the best vendor our company works with.”
The interviewees who utilized Akeneo integrators spoke very highly of them. The machinery and parts manufacturer’s VP marketing, e-commerce, and customer experience described it this way: “I must say that our high grades for Akeneo include how impressed we were with their partners. We interviewed three partners. They showed commitment to Akeneo and knowledge of our business challenges. The integrator we chose was fully engaged and helped make us feel good about our Akeneo investment.
As the central source for product information, Akeneo became the central source for product regulation data. In that role, Akeneo was used to provide product compliance, reducing audits costs and fines due to regulation noncompliance. The consumer electronics distributor’s director of digital and e-commerce marketing shared: “Akeneo helps us massively with regulation compliance. Part of our product completeness process includes shipping regulations and other regulations that we need to adhere to. There are so many different pieces of information that you have to get right. Getting that information wrong can lead to fines and all sorts of other trouble.”
Akeneo helped people across the organizations get easy access to product information. Interviewees described how individuals were accessing product information directly from Akeneo or through applications that Akeneo was integrated with. This access saved people time, provided consistent quality product data, and ensured the democratization of product information.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Akeneo’s PIM solution and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Interviewees spoke of selling to new categories of customers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The specialty product distributor’s IT director shared that product managers were able to quickly adapt technical descriptions that were effective for historically technical personas, into less technical language and assets in order to reach less technical clientele.
Integration with many internal applications as well as the ease-of-use of Akeneo has made it the focal point for timely, accurate product information. Akeneo-sourced product information was used to assist in shipping product as well as provide information to salespeople. These were new use cases or use cases that exceeded expectations.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
Ref. | Costs | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ftr | Implementation, training, and licensing costs | $240,000 | $402,000 | $442,500 | $338,625 | $1,423,125 | $1,225,571 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $240,000 | $402,000 | $442,500 | $338,625 | $1,423,125 | $1,225,571 |
With Akeneo PIM Enterprise Edition, pricing started with a base price then there were additional costs for users, SKUs, and other add-ons. Implementation included Akeneo professional services, Akeneo integrator consulting, and customer resources, such as IT, product managers, project managers, etc. Akeneo also did the training for the composite organization.
Based on customer interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization:
The cost can vary based on:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | Implementation, training, and adding historical products | Interviews | $200,000 | $120,000 | $100,000 | ||
F2 | Licensing 30 users and 200,000 SKUs | Akeneo | $215,000 | $268,750 | $282,188 | ||
Ft | Implementation, training, and licensing costs | F1+F2 | $200,000 | $335,000 | $368,750 | $282,188 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑20% | ||||||
Ftr | Implementation, training, and licensing costs (risk-adjusted) | $240,000 | $402,000 | $442,500 | $338,625 | ||
Three-year total: $1,423,125 | Three-year present value: $1,225,571 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($345,000) | ($488,750) | ($271,688) | ($285,272) | ($1,390,709) | ($1,228,182) |
Total benefits | $0 | $1,969,100 | $2,310,863 | $2,681,933 | $6,961,895 | $5,714,871 |
Net benefits | ($345,000) | $1,480,350 | $2,039,175 | $2,396,661 | $5,571,186 | $4,486,689 |
ROI | 365% | |||||
Payback period (months) | <6 | |||||
View More
View Less
|
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
“Choose PXM To Deliver Best-In-Class CX,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Akeneo, August 2022.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.