August 2022
Outsourcing in the post-pandemic era is evolving beyond legacy infrastructure maintenance to meet today’s challenging and complex business needs. In the midst of rapid change, enterprises considering outsourcing must look beyond hard cost savings to enable activities that accelerate innovation, improve retention, and create differentiation. Ensono’s infrastructure transformation and modernization services help organizations accelerate digital transformation and achieve lasting business outcomes.
Ensono provides IT infrastructure transformation and modernization services, enabling organizations to digitally transform and modernize across platforms to achieve business outcomes with a broad portfolio of management services and capabilities, including cloud-native development, managed public cloud, private cloud, and mainframe services. Ensono provides a flexible engagement model that includes any combination of remote or hosted management of customer IT infrastructure, replacement with Ensono-owned equipment, and data center or cloud migrations.
Ensono commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact (TEI) study.1 The purpose of this study is to examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services and provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed and surveyed decision-makers at four organizations using Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services. Forrester also surveyed 54 CEOs, CIOs, and VPs whose organizations invested in or are planning to invest in an IT infrastructure managed service provider (MSP). This survey, commissioned by Ensono, was designed to gain a more granular understanding of the current and anticipated business impacts of recent market trends including the Great Resignation. Results were combined into a single composite organization, a global, multibillion-dollar organization with 3,600 employees, a hybrid-IT infrastructure environment, and operations in a general regulated industry.
Prior to using Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services, the interviewees’ organizations struggled with antiquated technology, capacity limitations, and the loss or lack of internal expertise, which exposed them to a host of issues including unreliable application performance, slow application development, and increased security risk. Several interviewees cited difficulties acquiring and retaining IT talent given tight labor market conditions. Likewise, 79% of the IT executives surveyed believe that current employee attrition trends, commonly referred to as the Great Resignation, have had or will have some degree of impact on their business.2 For most organizations, IT was not the main focus of the business, and the challenges it presented distracted from their abilities to achieve their business goals.
After the investment in Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services, interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations were able to reduce their IT infrastructure and labor costs by a significant degree. Ensono was also able to deliver security and performance improvements that reduced network downtime. After investing in an MSP, their companies gained numerous strategic improvements, including being able to take advantage of more growth opportunities, freeing IT staff to spend more time on higher-value tasks and increasing staff productivity.
Benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits and the top unquantifiable benefits for the composite organization include:
The composite organization considers Ensono to be a significant business partner and adviser to its business operations. Stakeholders especially appreciate Ensono’s culture as a relentless ally, which is evident in proximity to senior management, transparency, willingness to collaborate, and follow-through on challenging technical issues.
The composite organization is able to do more with the same or fewer resources thanks to process improvements, increased automation, and optimized and streamlined production flows. Ensono eliminates underutilized capacity and helps it negotiate better pricing on cloud services and software licenses. Over three years, the savings are worth more than $1.2 million to the composite organization.
Ensono empowers the composite organization to expand its business by providing the ability to tap additional processing capacity when needed.
Outsourcing infrastructure management to Ensono gives the composite organization a more efficient IT environment to operate in, removing technology barriers that interrupt flow and can contribute to employee frustration and dissatisfaction. As a result of working with Ensono, employees can focus on more strategic work, such as expanding the composite organization’s customer base, supporting new business initiatives, and enabling faster time-to-market.
Contracting with Ensono enables the composite organization to avoid the challenges of finding and hiring IT infrastructure expertise. The company can reallocate existing hires and avoid future planned staffing. Over three years, the savings amount to more than $1.6 million for the composite organization.
Ensono reduces weekly initial program load (IPL) processing times and brings structure and best practices to security functions, improving network uptime. The recaptured uptime is estimated to save the composite organization $1.8 million over three years.
Additional unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified in this study include:
Ensono supports customers through associates assigned to each account that include the customer success team, account managers, director of operations, and help desk staff. The teams are focused on providing transparency, openness, quick response times, and overall helpfulness.
Ensono provides superior technical experts who are willing to engage and collaborate with customers’ own internal staff. Decision-makers at the composite organization believe that Ensono’s technicians help the IT team better understand the organization’s infrastructure and how to manage it, making it easier to communicate with senior management on reasons for making changes.
Ensono modern IT management technologies, systems integration, and management practices enables organizations to achieve higher levels of application performance, availability, and business performance.
Ensono services include restructuring and upgrading customer networks and putting improved security monitoring and patching processes into place, which can result in faster response to and resolution of issues.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services are customized for each customer and vary based on the customer’s infrastructure and the specific services provided. The risk-adjusted PV of Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services costs for the composite organization come to just less than $2.9 million over three years.
The composite organization takes six months to plan, migrate, test, and deploy the IT infrastructure modernization initially needed for making the switch to Ensono. In subsequent years, these costs are reduced by more than half. The three-year, risk-adjusted PV associated with these costs comes to $407,100.
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $4.72 million over three years versus costs of $3.31 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $1.41 million and an ROI of 43%.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Ensono IT infrastructure management services can have on an organization.
Interviewed Ensono stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Ensono IT infrastructure management services.
Interviewed four representatives at organizations using Ensono IT infrastructure management services to obtain data with respect to costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Ensono and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in IT infrastructure management services.
Ensono reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Ensono provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Role | Industry | Revenue | Region | Employees | Data Centers | Mainframes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VP of managed services | Software | $250M to $500M | Global | 4,500 | 2 (1 in process of migration) | 1 remote hosted |
Mainframe tech delivery specialist | Insurance | $2B to $5B | Global | 3,500 | 1 | 2 remote hosted |
Director of IT | Utilities | $10M to $25M | US | 375 | 1 | 0 |
VP of infrastructure | Retail | $500M to $1B | Global | 6,500 | 1 | 0 |
Forrester conducted a custom survey on behalf of Ensono in June 2022, and results include responses from 54 CEOs, CIOs, and VPs of infrastructure. Prior to signing up with Ensono, organizations of both interviewees and survey respondents struggled with common challenges, including:
Several interviewees noted their organization’s IT infrastructure had reached the limits of what it could accomplish. One interviewee, a VP of managed services for a software firm, said that their organization’s hardware was so outdated, it was unable to add more disk capacity without a lengthy upgrade of hard drives. These hosting capacity limits constrained sales opportunities and slowed time-to-market.
Another interviewee, a VP of infrastructure for a company in the retail industry, echoed the need for a wholesale reevaluation of their organization’s IT infrastructure, noting that instabilities had led to frequent network failures. High costs and a legal dispute with a cloud vendor drove this organization to migrate to a new cloud provider.
The director of IT for a company in the utilities industry reinforced the need for modernization. They said: “If we continue on with [the infrastructure we had in place], we’re going to have to double the server counts, put load balancers in, and essentially double the cost of our infrastructure [and] potentially triple the cost if we need to do more servers. One of the things we were looking for was the provider to help us to some extent modernize what we have and take advantage of what cloud platforms are able to offer as we scale in high availability to not have everything in our data center.”
A majority of survey respondents reported key IT complexity and high costs as reasons for shifting their organizations’ IT strategies to work with an MSP. Fifty-nine percent reported that IT infrastructure systems were becoming increasingly complex, 54% said that IT infrastructure was at capacity limits, and 46% stated that high operation and maintenance costs were a reason for the transition to an MSP.3
The director of IT for a company in the utilities industry said their organization struggled with limited IT resources and infrastructure expertise needed to manage both the company’s rapid growth as well as to integrate the IT infrastructure assets of a recently acquired company.
The VP of infrastructure for the retail organization also noted multiple knowledge and resource gaps as a result of previous corporate turmoil.
The director of IT in the utilities industry described their organization’s patching process as inefficient and inconsistent, leaving it exposed to security breaches.
Several interviewees cited difficulties acquiring and retaining IT talent given tight labor market conditions. The mainframe tech delivery specialist in the insurance industry explained that expertise was retiring out of their organization, and backfilling these positions was becoming cost-prohibitive, leaving the organization lacking the expertise and resources to effectively migrate applications off its mainframe. Thirty-five percent of survey respondents reported staff shortages as a reason for working with or planning to work with an MSP, and 31% reported rising labor costs as an additional reason.4
Thirty-nine percent of survey respondents reported that IT issues distract from their organization’s business focus.5 For many organizations of the survey respondents and interviewees, IT was not the main focus of the business, so the challenges it presented distracted from their abilities to achieve their other business goals.
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a managed service provider that could:
These expected benefits are similar to those identified in the custom survey research. Twelve of 13 executives at organizations planning to work with a managed service provider rated all of the following attributes as important or very important benefits to receive, compared to its current environment:
Other important reasons include helping the company become more competitive and enabling the business to focus on other higher-value or more creative initiatives.6
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
The composite is a global, multibillion-dollar organization with 3,600 employees, and it operates in a general regulated industry. The organization has a hybrid IT infrastructure with a remote hosted data center, one mainframe, and a cloud presence. The organization wishes to modernize its IT infrastructure and expand cloud resources. Its mainframe staff is graying out of the workforce.
IT infrastructure management services provided by Ensono cover the composite organization’s data center, mainframe, and cloud services, all remotely hosted.
Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atr | Avoided IT infrastructure and software license costs | $270,000 | $497,250 | $724,613 | $1,491,863 | $1,200,817 |
Btr | IT infrastructure labor cost savings | $567,000 | $715,500 | $751,500 | $2,034,000 | $1,671,390 |
Ctr | Reduction in network downtime | $742,295 | $742,295 | $742,295 | $2,226,884 | $1,845,977 |
Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $1,579,295 | $1,955,045 | $2,218,407 | $5,752,746 | $4,718,184 |
Interviewees consider Ensono a significant business partner and adviser to their organizations’ business operations. According to the mainframe tech delivery specialist: “The overall relationship is very strong. The majority of senior management at Ensono knows us and is attentive to our needs. I’ve been impressed with Ensono, and I am looking to engage with them further to learn their business and their depth on a technical level.”
This was reinforced by the VP of infrastructure for the company in the retail industry. They said: “[It’s great] just having that partner to work with the heavy lifting with regard to doing these migrations, whether from on-prem or cloud to cloud. We’ve relied on them a lot for that work, and they have helped. I hold my vendors to the same performance level as my own staff. What I like about Ensono is they don’t BS. They are transparent. I can work with them. Most importantly, we find resolution. We find common ground. We find ways to fix issues and then, most importantly, they follow through and they execute on it.”
Survey responses in the custom survey Forrester conducted for Ensono reinforce the strategic impact of engaging with an IT infrastructure MSP. Among CEOs and VPs from organizations that work with an MSP, many agreed or strongly agreed that the top benefits their companies received includes:7
Ensono’s services enabled interviewees’ organizations to reduce IT infrastructure costs by a significant degree.
To model this benefit for the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Factors impacting the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Avoided intrastructure costs | Interviews | $250,000 | $500,000 | $750,000 | ||
A2 | Annual software license cost reduction | Composite (5% yearly growth) | $50,000 | $52,500 | $55,125 | ||
At | Avoided IT infrastructure and software license costs | A1+A2 | $300,000 | $552,500 | $805,125 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||||
Atr | Avoided IT infrastructure and software license costs (risk-adjusted) | $270,000 | $497,250 | $724,613 | |||
Three-year total: $1,491,863 | Three-year present value: $1,200,817 | ||||||
|
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the IT workforce was already facing a talent shortage that was made more competitive because tech workers are not constrained to a particular industry.9
Now, employment changes, such as Baby Boomer retirement and younger people choosing different career paths have been accelerated by the pandemic.10
Among the IT executives surveyed, 79% believe these attrition trends, commonly referred to as the Great Resignation, have had or will have some degree of impact on their business.11 In response to these concerns, 96% of the executives are planning or already changing what their organization does. They are taking steps such as improving the technology environment for better collaboration and productivity or leveraging strategic partners to outsource management of IT infrastructure department(s).12
Outsourcing infrastructure management to Ensono gave the interviewees’ organizations more efficient IT environments to operate in, removing technology barriers that interrupt flow or productivity and can contribute to the frustration and dissatisfaction that causes employees to leave.
Of the 41 surveyed executives whose organization works with an MSP today, 95% agree or strongly agree that their partnerships with their MSPs have enabled their business to focus on higher-value and more creative initiatives. Additionally, 83% of those executives agree or strongly agree that improved employee retention is a direct benefit of these partnerships.13
Interviewees noted that their organizations were able to focus on more strategic work (e.g., growing their customer bases, supporting new business initiatives, enabling faster time-to-market) as a result of working with Ensono. The director of IT for the company in the utilities industry underscored this with their plans to move to more of a cloud-based architecture to facilitate this enhanced state of productivity.
By giving customers the ability to tap additional processing capacity when needed, Ensono empowers them to grow their businesses. Because customers lease hardware rather than buy it, they can scale their infrastructure up or down more quickly in response to fast-changing business needs.
According to a VP of managed services for a software firm: “The difference now is it’s not dedicated hardware. Now, if I need more disk space, I just ask. If I need more memory or CPU, it’s just a change request and some coordination. [Ensono] can very quickly provide me with the additional capacity and power needed for my operation. [The added capacity] allows [my organization] to sell to more customers because we don’t have the limitation in growth.”
Responses from the custom survey Forrester Consulting conducted highlight the potential impact of using an MSP on business-growth opportunities. Ninety-five percent of executives at companies using an MSP in their IT organizations agree or strongly agree that their business can take advantage of more growth opportunities. Additionally, 80% agree or strongly agree that their business has grown at a higher rate since investing in an MSP.14
Contracting for Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services enabled interviewees’ organizations to avoid the difficulty and expense of finding and hiring IT infrastructure expertise themselves and allowed them to reallocate existing hires and future planned staffing.
To model this benefit for the composite organization, Forrester assumes that by shifting IT infrastructure management work to Ensono and reallocating existing staff to other activities, the composite organization avoids costs associated with recruiting, training, and employing three FTEs in Year 1, two additional FTEs in Year 2, and one additional FTE in Year 3.
A key factor impacting the realization of this benefit is the size and composition of the organization’s IT staff relative to needed skills before and after the Ensono investment.
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $1.7 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | IT infrastructure labor reallocation (FTE) | Interviews | 3 | 5 | 6 | ||
B2 | Average annual cost of IT infrastructure technician (fully burdened) | TEI standard | $125,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 | ||
B3 | IT infrastructure employee recruiting and hiring avoided (FTE) | Interviews | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
B4 | IT infrastructure employee replacement cost | Industry average | $85,000 | $85,000 | $85,000 | ||
Bt | IT infrastructure labor cost savings | (B1*B2)+(B3*B4) | $630,000 | $795,000 | $835,000 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||||
Btr | IT infrastructure labor cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $567,000 | $715,500 | $751,500 | |||
Three-year total: $2,034,000 | Three-year present value: $1,671,390 | ||||||
|
The interviewees discussed security and performance improvements Ensono was able to deliver and the impact this had on network downtime.16
To model this benefit for the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Factors impacting the realization of this benefit include:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $1.8 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | IT infrastructure operational uptime before Ensono investment | Interviews | 99.00% | 99.00% | 99.00% | ||
C2 | Average number of hours per year of network downtime prior to Ensono | (1-C1)*(8,760) | 88 | 88 | 88 | ||
C3 | IT infrastructure operational uptime after Ensono investment | Interviews | 99.97% | 99.97% | 99.97% | ||
C4 | Average number of hours per year of network downtime after Ensono investment | (1-C3)*(8,760) | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
C5 | Revenue | Composite | $1,500,000,000 | $1,500,000,000 | $1,500,000,000 | ||
C6 | Revenue affected by Ensono | C5*6% | $90,000,000 | $90,000,000 | $90,000,000 | ||
C7 | Revenue per hour affected by Ensono | C6/8760 | $10,274 | $10,274 | $10,274 | ||
Ct | Reduction in network downtime | (C2-C4)*(C7) | $873,288 | $873,288 | $873,288 | ||
Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||||
Ctr | Reduction in network downtime (risk-adjusted) | $742,295 | $742,295 | $742,295 | |||
Three-year total: $2,226,884 | Three-year present value: $1,845,977 | ||||||
|
Additional benefits that customers experienced but were not able to quantify include:
The interviewed decision-makers were uniformly positive about the Ensono associates assigned to their organizations’ accounts, including the customer success team, account managers, directors of operations, and help desk staff, and they were appreciative of [Ensono’s] transparency, openness, quick response times, and overall helpfulness. According to the VP of managed services at the software firm: “We have a good relationship. We have good collaboration. Ensono is easy to work with. Every time I need some extra attention, I’m getting it. From a performance and work-relation perspective, I have no reason to look elsewhere. I’m getting good service from Ensono.”
The director of IT at the company in the utilities industry also voiced appreciation for the breadth and resourcefulness of Ensono’s account team. They said: “With our previous vendor, I was always talking to one person. With Ensono, there’s a person who helps make sure the onboarding is smooth, and I have two people I can call directly, and they’ll pick up the phone. When we get into more technical discussions, they will find someone that lives and breathes in that space and get them on the phone.”
The same interviewee said Ensono’s technicians helped educate them about their IT environment and understand why things are done in a certain way. Learning more about IT infrastructure and best practices for managing it from Ensono helped this interviewee communicate better with senior management on reasons for making changes.
The mainframe tech delivery specialist echoed this, saying: “[Ensono’s] technicians have been very forthcoming. They’re very knowledgeable and easy to work with.”
Asked to comment on Ensono’s technical expertise, the VP of infrastructure for the company in the retail industry said: “How do you get the best quality code sets out there in as short a time possible with the highest quality? Ensono has hired very experienced people in both cloud and the DevOps world.”
The interviewees’ organizations benefitted from Ensono’s more up-to-date technology. A VP of managed services for a software company said: “The new machines we moved to are much faster with much better performance. We are not at risk of missing our online SLA compliance. We have happier clients and the extra capacity to add more clients.”
A director of IT for an organization in the utilities industry confirmed the value provided by Ensono modernizing their organization’s IT infrastructure and related processes. They said, “Lots of things here were not done before Ensono was brought in due to inexperience.”
The VP of managed services for the software company said Ensono restructured and upgraded their organization’s network and put improved security monitoring and patching processes in place, resulting in faster response to and resolution of issues. The VP added that Ensono was more flexible than their organization’s prior vendor in scheduling and running disaster recovery drills.
Additionally, 84% of IT executives surveyed said that partnering with an MSP has led to a reduction in security breaches.17
The same interviewee noted that Ensono helped their organization meet performance SLAs. Prior to Ensono, backups took too long. They said, “Now we can get up faster and not risk missing our online window, which we have accelerated on.”
These benefits are similar to those identified in the commissioned survey. Respondents whose company is working with a managed service provider agreed or strongly agreed that their organization received the following benefits from using a managed service provider:18
While the value of flexibility is unique to each customer, the importance of adaptability and agility in a rapidly evolving technology landscape and unpredictable world is clear. Organizations that choose to manage their own on-premises solutions or enlist help from a partner for staff augmentation are often challenged with rigid contracts that can stymie business agility.
Ensono allows customers to shift workloads across service platforms at any time during their engagement without incurring additional charges. This gives customers the flexibility to focus on their immediate requirements, without worrying about the IT impacts of future circumstances, whether anticipated or unforeseen.
There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement IT infrastructure management services and later realize additional uses and business opportunities. The interviewees noted numerous future projects in planning stages for which they expect to engage with Ensono, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
Ref. | Costs | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dtr | Ensono services cost | $0 | $825,000 | $1,100,000 | $1,650,000 | $3,575,000 | $2,898,760 |
Etr | Internal labor costs for IT infrastructure modernization and migration projects | $240,075 | $106,425 | $44,550 | $44,550 | $435,600 | $407,114 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $240,075 | $931,425 | $1,144,550 | $1,694,550 | $4,010,600 | $3,305,874 |
Ensono’s IT infrastructure management services are customized for each customer and vary based on the customer’s infrastructure and the specific services provided. For example, data center management costs are based on the size of the data center, not headcount, which one interviewee at a growing organization said provides important flexibility. The Ensono contracts of the interviewees’ organizations contracts range from $2 million to $2.4 million per year.
Based on discussions with Ensono, Forrester assumes the composite organization pays $750,000 for Ensono IT infrastructure management services in Year 1, $1 million in Year 2, and $1.5 million in Year 3.
Costs will vary based on:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.9 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | Ensono IT infrastructure management cost | Interviews | $0 | $750,000 | $1,000,000 | $1,500,000 | |
Dt | Ensono services cost | D1 | $0 | $750,000 | $1,000,000 | $1,500,000 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Dtr | Ensono services cost (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $825,000 | $1,100,000 | $1,650,000 | ||
Three-year total: $3,575,000 | Three-year present value: $2,898,760 | ||||||
|
The interviewed decision-makers estimated it took on average six months to plan, migrate, test, and deploy the IT infrastructure modernization initially needed for making the switch to Ensono. In subsequent years, these costs were reduced by more than half.
Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization relative to its initial IT infrastructure modernization effort and subsequent migration projects:
These costs may vary for another organization due to several factors:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $407,100.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Number of months to plan, migrate, test, and deploy | Interviews | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
E2 | Number of DBA (FTE) | Interviews | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
E3 | Number of IT (FTE) | Interviews | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
E4 | Percent of time dedicated to IT infrastructure modernization and migration projects | Interviews | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
E5 | Average fully burdened annual compensation for DBA staff | TEI Standard | $110,000 | $110,000 | $110,000 | $110,000 | |
E6 | Average fully located annual compensation for IT staff | TEI Standard | $125,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 | |
Et | Internal labor costs for IT infrastructure modernization and migration projects | (E1*E2*E4*E5/4)+(E1*E3*E4*E6/4) | $218,250 | $96,750 | $40,500 | $40,500 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Etr | Internal labor costs for IT infrastructure modernization and migration projects (risk-adjusted) | $240,075 | $106,425 | $44,550 | $44,550 | ||
Three-year total: $435,600 | Three-year present value: $407,114 | ||||||
|
These risk-adjusted ROI and NPV values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($240,075)) | ($931,425) | ($1,144,550) | ($1,694,550) | ($4,010,600) | ($3,305,874) |
Total benefits | $0 | $1,579,295 | $1,955,045 | $2,218,407 | $5,752,746 | $4,718,184 |
Net benefits | ($240,075) | $647,870 | $810,495 | $523,857 | $1,742,146 | $1,412,310 |
ROI | 43% | |||||
Payback | <6 months | |||||
|
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI and NPV for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 th at are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
2 The percentages referenced in this sentence are based on 54 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are planning to or are already working with an MSP responding to the following question: “To what degree do you feel the Great Resignation (aka, the large recent attrition of IT and other employees from companies) has impacted or will impact your organization's success?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
3 The percentages referenced in this sentence are based on 54 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are planning to or are already working with an MSP responding to the following question: “What challenges would/did your company hope to address by implementing a managed service provider for its IT infrastructure and operations?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 The survey results referenced in this section are based on 13 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are planning to work with an MSP responding to the following question: “How important would it be for your company to receive each of these as a benefit from a managed service provider as compared to its previous environment?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
7 The percentages referenced in this section are based on 41 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP responding to the following question: “How much do you agree or disagree that these are benefits your company has received from using a managed service provider as compared to its previous environment?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
8 The percentages referenced in this section are based on 31 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP and responding to the following question: “What has been the percentage decrease in total IT infrastructure management expenditures since partnering with a managed service provider?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
9 Source: “Unpacking The Hype About The Great Resignation,” Forrester Research, Inc., March 7, 2022.
10 Source: “The Great Resignation: The Reality Behind The Headlines,” Forrester Research, Inc., March 9, 2022.
11 The percentages referenced in this sentence are based on 54 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are planning to or are already working with an MSP responding to the following question: “To what degree do you feel the Great Resignation (aka, the large recent attrition of IT and other employees from companies) has impacted or will impact your organization's success?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
12 The percentages referenced in this sentence are based on 54 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are planning to or are already working with an MSP responding to the following question: “What is your organization currently doing/planning to do differently because of the Great Resignation?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
13 The percentages referenced in this section are based on 41 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP responding to the following question: “How much do you agree or disagree that these are benefits your company has received from using a managed service provider as compared to its previous environment?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
14 The percentages referenced in this section are based on 39 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP responding to the following question: “How much do you agree or disagree that your organization has realized the following improvements due to its investment in an MSP?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
15 The percentages referenced in this sentence are based on 54 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are planning to or are already working with an MSP responding to the following question: “How much is your organization currently changing or planning to change its hiring and retention practices?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
16 The percentages referenced in the callout are based on 36 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP responding to the following question, “On average, what has been the percentage decrease in overall operational downtime since implementing a managed service provider?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
17 The percentages referenced in this section are based on 33 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP and responded to the following question: “What has been the percentage decrease in security breaches since partnering with a managed service provider?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022.
18 The percentages referenced in this section are based on 41 US CEOs and VPs who work at IT organizations that are working with an MSP responding to the following question: “How much do you agree or disagree that these are benefits your company has received from using a managed service provider as compared to its previous environment?” Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Ensono, June, 2022