May 2023
The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform provides organizations with the ability to unify their approaches to databases, data analytics, data governance, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence and machine learning on a single platform. It enables the flexibility and scale sorely lacking in on-premises data and analytics architectures, which helps organizations avoid the costs associated with these while increasing the ability to integrate and adopt the latest technologies to advance operations and competitive advantage.
Microsoft offers a unified approach to organizations’ broad data and analytics needs with the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform. The platform incorporates cloud-based databases, analytics services, governance services, and artificial intelligence and machine-learning services on a single platform. It brings flexibility, scalability, and the easy integration and incorporation of the latest data technologies all on a consumption-based model.
Microsoft commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five representatives of organizations with experience using parts of the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform and surveyed an additional 368 decision-makers. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global organization with 24,00 employees and revenue of $36 billion per year.
Interviewees noted that prior to exploring the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, their organizations leveraged expensive and inflexible on-premises infrastructures. In addition to high costs, the inflexibility of this type of architecture led to long data lead times; high time and labor costs to integrate newer solutions and technologies; and difficulties providing adequate security, governance, and compliance.
The interviewees said that after exploring an investment in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, their organizations estimated they would be able to reduce their costs to integrate and scale; increase the productivity of their data professionals while improving the ability of employees to leverage data insights; improve the security, governance, and compliance of their data; and reduce infrastructure costs and outages while being able to better analyze customer behavior to improve revenues.
Consulting Team: Nick Mayberry
Quantified projected benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Higher efficiency of data integrations of 23% (low) to 46% (high). By moving from an on-premises architecture for data and analytics to an Azure-based one that leverages the unified The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, the composite reduces the time cost of integrations by between 23% and 46%. Additionally, it saves between 240 and 480 hours annually on the cost of scaling this infrastructure.
Increased productivity of data and analytics work between 30% (low) and 50% (high). With data being readily available, integrated, and analyzable in the cloud, the composite reduces the time it takes its data professionals to do their work by between 30% and 50%, which is further supported by the ability to reuse templatized internal data products. Additionally, the time spent waiting for data by the broader employee base is reduced between 38% and 56% as data analytics work is completed faster.
Improved efficiency of data security, governance, and compliance work by 10% (low) and 70% (high). By leveraging unified cloud products from the same vendor while outsourcing certain work to Azure, the composite saves between 10% and 15% of its data security costs, between 19% and 70% of its data governance costs, and between 15% and 30% of its regulatory data-compliance costs.
Decreased costs of on-premises infrastructure and vendor management by 30% (low) to 50% (high). As the composite moves away from its on-premises data and analytics infrastructure, it decommissions the same at a rate of one-third annually. This eventually reduces the costs to manage this infrastructure between 30% and 50%. It also saves up to between $775,000 and $1.8 million on the direct annual expenses of this technology.
Fewer outages by between 90% (low) and 99% (high). Because uptime is the responsibility of Azure, the composite saves between 90% and 99% of the costs it previously incurred from outages that impact its on-premises data and analytics infrastructure.
More income from better customer analytics by up to between 1% (low) and 2% (high). Because data and analytics work leverages more data faster, customer insights become more useful. This improves the composite organization’s ability to predict customer behavior and leads to improved revenues by up to between 1% and 2%.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Partner ecosystem. The composite leverages Microsoft’s broad partner ecosystem to quickly take advantage of the latest vetted technologies.
Reduced risk of a breach. Because security professionals are more efficient and much of their prior work is outsourced to Azure, the composite reduces its risk of a potential security breach that would impact its data and analytics infrastructure.
Improved customer service. The composite quickly gets data into the hands of its operational teams, which allows it to optimize and improve its customer and stakeholder service.
Easier to find and train talent. Because Microsoft leverages open standards and a unified layer on top of its services, the composite finds it easier to hire and retain talent that knows the broad swathe of languages that can be used with the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.
Better employee experience. Similarly, the composite’s employees enjoy their work more because they spend less time putting out fires and more time answering the big, important questions needed to advance the business.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning. The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform also brings the ability to more easily take advantage of AI and ML, which the composite leverages to automate more work and uncover deeper insights into its operations.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Azure fees for the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.The composite incurs monthly recurring costs based on the amount of data it has stored on Azure servers and the amount of this data that it leverages for its analytics. The composite incurs additional costs if it needs to utilize transactional data in the future.
Migration costs. To implement and deploy the broadest scope of the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, the composite needs 75 FTEs to work over 12 months before it starts to see the benefits of the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.
Ongoing management. The composite needs four FTEs to manage the various the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform databases, analytics, governance, and AI/ML services on an ongoing basis.
Forrester modeled a range of projected low-, medium-, and high-impact outcomes based on evaluated risk. This financial analysis projects that the composite organization accrues the following three-year net present value (NPV) for each scenario by enabling The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform:
The objective of the framework is to identify the potential cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the projected impact that the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform can have on an organization.
Interviewed Microsoft stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.
Interviewed five representatives at organizations using the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform in a pilot or beta stage to obtain data with respect to projected costs, benefits, and risks. Surveyed an additional 368 decision-makers globally.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations.
Constructed a projected financial model representative of the interviews and survey responses using the New Tech TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Employed four fundamental elements of New Tech TEI in modeling the investment’s potential impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Microsoft and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.
Microsoft reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Microsoft provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Before investing in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, the interviewees’ organizations each leveraged various on-premises technologies for their data and analytics work.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the five interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite is a global enterprise organization with 24,000 employees and $36 billion in annual revenues. It has already heavily invested in an on-premises data and analytics solution architecture, but it is challenged to keep these expensive solutions modern and secure. High time costs to integrate and scale mean that insights are delayed, and any data ingested and leveraged for insight is often stale before it can be effectively leveraged.
Deployment characteristics. As part of the composite organization’s larger transformation to leverage cloud-based technologies for its flexibility and future-forward services, the composite invests in a broad swath of solutions under the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform umbrella. It intends to use the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform for its databases, analytics, governance, and AI/ML, and it deploys:
(Showing "Very important")
Projected Benefits | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total projected benefits (low) | $6,375,150 | $11,850,300 | $13,547,500 | $31,772,950 | $25,767,664 |
Total projected benefits (mid) | $8,404,950 | $15,839,400 | $17,935,534 | $42,179,884 | $34,206,508 |
Total projected benefits (high) | $10,666,500 | $20,311,500 | $23,020,270 | $53,998,270 | $43,778,651 |
Evidence and data. The interviewees and survey respondents shared that transitioning to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform improved the efficiency of their organizations’ data analytics solution integration and scaling work.
Regarding integration, the interviewees consistently mentioned that Azure’s cloud-based connectors were key to simplifying the establishment of integrations and accelerating data ingestion. For example, the platform architect from an energy firm stated: “Azure’s native connectors enable us to do data explorations and pipe data into our solutions much faster. They accelerate our ability to take things from an idea to really proving it out.” This interviewee shared that it used to take 15% to 20% of someone’s time if they were building a new integration between point solutions but that, with Azure, this has been reduced to “almost no time at all.”
The data and analytics architect from a financial services firm noted: “When we needed to ingest a new data source into our legacy data warehouse, it was much harder to achieve. Now, it’s very easy to use Azure’s connections to integrate and orchestrate our solutions. It’s a much more unified experience.” This interviewee also shared that their organization reduced its integration time from two months per quarter for two or three IT professionals down to a couple of days.
Survey respondents said they expect that leveraging the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would reduce the cost of integrating data and analytics solutions by:
The interviewees also noted that moving to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform had a positive impact on the scaling of their organizations’ data and analytics infrastructures. For example, the platform architect from the energy industry shared that before utilizing the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, it would take up to one month to scale data and analytics infrastructure when needed. One-quarter of this time was spent actually completing the scaling work and three-quarters of this time was spent just waiting to procure the necessary infrastructure. The same interviewee said that with the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, scaling takes only a few hours.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $1.6 million (low) to $3.1 million (high).
(Showing top 5 "Somewhat agree" and "Strongly agree")
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | IT professionals who work on solution integration and scaling | Composite | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||
A2 | Percent of time spent on solution integration annually | Interviews | 60% | 60% | 60% | ||
A3LOW A3MID A3HIGH |
Integration efficiency improvement | Survey | 23% 33% 46% |
23% 33% 46% |
23% 33% 46% |
||
A4 | Fully burdened annual rate of an IT professional | TEI standard | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | ||
A5LOW A5MID A5HIGH |
Avoided time spent scaling on-premises infrastructure (hours) | Interviews | 240 360 480 |
240 360 480 |
240 360 480 |
||
A6 | Percent of benefits achieved | Composite | 50% | 100 | 100% | ||
AtLOW AtMID AtHIGH |
Solution integration and scaling efficiencies | (A1*A2*A3*A4+A1*A5*A4/2,000)*A6 | $387,000 $567,000 $774,000 |
$774,000 $1,134,000 $1,548,000 |
$774,000 $1,134,000 $1,548,000 |
||
Three-year total: $1.9 million to $3.9 million | Three-year present value: $1.6 million to $3.1 million | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. The interviewees and survey respondents said investing in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would have a positive impact on the efficiency of data and analytics work and that it would benefit both data professionals and the broader employee base.
They said part of this benefit is attributable to the accelerated integrations and scaling provided by uniting data and analytics work on Azure solutions. For example, the platform architect from the energy industry stated: “The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would also improve the productivity of our data professionals because workload scaling becomes nearly instantaneous. Access to data becomes faster, as does the ability to deploy to test and production environments.”
The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform also enables the establishment of templatized internal data products, which enables more efficient data access while reducing data sprawl. The same interviewee said: “People used to take data, copy it from its source system, and do their own analysis. The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform enables us to have produced data products at the ready. These are sanctioned and viable, letting users access the same sets of data from the same place and run analyses. It also improves trust in our data.”
The data and analytics domain manager from a financial services firm concurred, saying: “For payments, we used to have a team building their own repository for data analysis, but now this is in a global platform. The team no longer needs to maintain their own repository. They can just be a producer for the global repository.” This interviewee estimated that improved access to global repositories helped to improve their organization’s data science productivity by as much as five times. They also estimated that the efficiency of data professionals improved by 30% for data scientists and 10% for data analysts.
Importantly, these benefits have a knock-on effect to the wider employee base. For example, the director of analytics from the healthcare industry noted that their organization was able to significantly improve the delivery of data to end users by between 6 to 7 hours. They said: “All of our practitioners will monitor the data. But, if they can only see yesterday’s data in the late afternoon, you’ve lost a lot of hours in the day. Sometimes, a patient will even be discharged. So, we would have to follow up with them for additional care after the data comes in.”
The data and analytics architect from a financial services firm concurred, saying: “The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform allows us to reduce end-user wait times for data because it gets us out of central gatekeeping. We are saving 15 to 20 people waiting around for results on multiple requests monthly.” The data and analytics domain manager from another financial services firm similarly estimated that whole teams previously sometimes waited two weeks for data requests, and now they receive answers in just a few days — if not hours.
Survey respondents estimated that the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would improve the productivity of data and analytics work by:
They also estimated that it would improve the productivity of the broader employee base by:
Both interviewees and survey respondents estimated that the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would further enhance productivity of both data professionals and the broader employee base by improving the development and adoption of AI and automation at their organizations.
For example, the director of data platforms from a professional services organization noted that their firm used the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform to establish optical character recognition for automated form reading. First, they noted that by utilizing a unified Azure-based platform, their organization was able to move from building new APIs for automation at the rate of about one per year to a rate of approximately one per month. Second, they said their organization used one particular API for automated form reading, and that given the number of forms the firm received annually, using the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform enabled the company to reduce a six-to nine-month processing time for any given form down to three days.
The director of analytics from the healthcare industry noted that their organization was able to use the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform to develop and deploy bots to prevent employees from repeating workstreams. For example, they said one hospital’s systems required the same data to be recorded five to six times in different locations. By deploying automated bots, it was able to prevent this repetitive work and have data recorded across all systems in parallel.
Survey respondents estimated that improved adoption of AI and automation would improve employees’ productivity by:
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $12.4 million (low) to $20 million (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Data professionals | Composite | 150 | 150 | 150 | ||
B2LOW B2MID B2HIGH |
Improved productivity of data professionals | Survey | 30% 40% 50% |
30% 40% 50% |
30% 40% 50% |
||
B3 | Fully burdened annual rate of a data professional | TEI standard | $200,000 | $200,000 | $200,000 | ||
B4 | Average number of employees who wait for a single data request | Composite | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||
B5 | Data requests annually | Interviews | 600 | 600 | 600 | ||
B6 | Prior wait time (hours) | Interviews | 80 | 80 | 80 | ||
B7LOW B7MID B7HIGH |
Improved efficiency of data requests | Survey | 38% 48% 56% |
38% 48% 56% |
38% 48% 56% |
||
B8 | Fully burdened hourly rate of a general employee | TEI standard | $35 | $35 | $35 | ||
B9 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | ||
B10 | Percent of benefits achieved | A6 | 50% | 100% | 100% | ||
BtLOW BtMID BtHIGH |
Improved productivity of data and analytics work | (B1*B2*B3+B4*B5*B6*B7*B8)*B9*B10 | $3,048,000 $4,008,000 $4,926,000 |
$6,096,000 $8,016,000 $9,852,000 |
$6,096,000 $8,016,000 $9,852,000 |
||
Three-year projected total: $15.2 million to $24.6 million | Three-year projected present value: $12.4 million to $20 million | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents said that in addition to making data professionals and the broader employee base more productive, investing in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would have a positive efficiency impact on data security, governance, and compliance work.
For example, the platform architect from the energy industry said: “Security work would definitely improve. Because it’s a smaller, more contained footprint to manage than point solutions, our security teams could deliver on security posture more cheaply and faster.”
The data and analytics domain manager from a financial services firm indicated that both data governance and data governance work would improve thanks to Microsoft’s better tools. They shared: “The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform has better monitoring and more possibilities [than competing solutions]. Our teams can now tackle security and governance end-to-end, with less handover compared to our prior on-premises environment. Patching has become far less complex and is done more and more by DevOps, freeing our security teams to focus more and even specialize.”
The director of data platforms from the professional services firm similarly said: “[The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform’s inclusion of Microsoft Purview means that] we can now scan and see data models in one shot. We’ve never had this level of visibility before, and it means the data business is not a black box to the developer.”
The data and analytics architect from a financial services firm also noted that Purview could enable a reduction in repeat work. They said: “We hope to get a lot more use out of existing artifacts with Purview. The ability to jump on existing data sets and analyses can reduce having to go through governance workflows over and over again, reducing days or weeks of wait time each time we want to leverage these artifacts.”
The same interviewee also said Purview has the ability to reduce the burden on audit and compliance work. They said: “Having an overview of data assets, their ownership, descriptions, and criticality levels will benefit the organization from multiple angles. On compliance, specifically, by providing an auditor with a working solution to prove that we track and classify data assets appropriately, we can save up to 50% of the current time devoted to these audits.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $1.6 million (low) to $3.5 million (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Number of security professionals | Composite | 20 | 20 | 20 | |||
C2LOW C2MID C2HIGH |
Added efficiency of security solution, posture, and threat management | Survey | 10% 13% 15% |
10% 13% 15% |
10% 13% 15% |
|||
C3 | Average fully burdened annual rate of a security professional | TEI standard | $180,000 | $180,000 | $180,000 | |||
C4 | Number of IT professionals working on data governance and regulatory compliance | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||
C5LOW C5MID C5HIGH |
Added efficiency of data governance | Survey | 19% 36% 70% |
19% 36% 70% |
19% 36% 70% |
|||
C6LOW C6MID C6HIGH |
Added efficiency of regulatory compliance | Survey | 15% 25% 30% |
15% 25% 30% |
15% 25% 30% |
|||
C7 | Fully burdened annual rate of an IT professional | A4 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | |||
C8 | Percent of benefit achieved | A6 | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
Ct | Improved efficiencies of data security, governance, and compliance | C1*C2*C3 | $1,080,000 | $1,282,500 | $1,500,000 | |||
Ctr | Improved efficiencies of data security, governance, and compliance | $1,026,000 | $1,218,375 | $1,425,000 | ||||
Three-year projected total: $1.9 million to $4.4 million | Three-year projected present value: | |||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents said they expect their organizations to save on the costs of their on-premises data and analytics infrastructures, its management, and the management of its vendors via decommissioning once they switched to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform on Azure.
For example, the director of data platforms from the professional services firm stated: “Once we fully adopt the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, it will be much easier to manage the same amount of data and analytics or even more with less dedicated resources. I’d expect this to reduce between 30% and 40% — no sweat.”
The data and analytics architect from a financial services firms said, “I expect to see savings of about 50% of resources dedicated to managing that infrastructure once we move over to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform fully.”
The director of data platforms also noted they also expect their organization to save on vendor management as well by moving away from point solutions and unifying data and analytics on Azure with the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform. They said: “We currently meet with 15 to 20 vendors. Over time, that would reduce to three or four total once we’re fully on the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform. This would mean months of discussion completely gone.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $5.8 million (low) to $10.5 million (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | IT professionals who manage data analytics infrastructure | Composite | 80 | 80 | 80 | |||
D2LOW D2MID D2HIGH |
Efficiency savings | Interview | 10% 13% 17% |
20% 26% 33% |
30% 40% 50% |
|||
D3 | Fully burdened annual rate of an IT professional | A4 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | |||
D4LOW D4MID D4HIGH |
Reduced cost from decommissioning prior solutions | Composite | $255,750 $321,750 $577,500 |
$511,500 $643,500 $1,155,000 |
$775,000 $975,000 $1,750,000 |
|||
DtLOW DtMID DtHIGH |
Reduced cost of prior solution and vendor management | D1*D2*D3+D4 | $1,206,150 $1,588,950 $2,161,500 |
$2,412,300 $3,177,900 $4,323,000 |
$3,655,000 $4,815,000 $6,550,000 |
|||
Three-year projected total: $7.2 million to $13 million | Three-year projected present value: $5.8 million to $10.5 million | |||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents said that by transitioning their organizations’ data and analytics infrastructures to Azure rather than on-premises, they expect to reduce the number of outages that impact this work. For example, the director of analytics from the healthcare industry noted that in their organization’s on-premises environment, it experienced frequent outages of up to one or two every month. These outages would last for days at a time and impacted the ability of the organization to run data and analytics workloads, which delayed important work. The interviewees and survey respondents noted that any outages on Azure last only minutes if they occur at all.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $3.4 million (low) to $3.7 million (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Prior average number of outages | Composite | 12 | 12 | 12 | |||
E2 | Prior average cost per outage | Survey | $125,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 | |||
E3LOW E3MID E3HIGH |
Reduction in outages | Composite | 90% 95% 99% |
90% 95% 99% |
90% 95% 99% |
|||
EtLOW EtMID EtHIGH |
Reduced outages | E1*E2*E3 | $1,350,000 $1,425,000 $1,485,000 |
$1,350,000 $1,425,000 $1,485,000 |
$1,350,000 $1,425,000 $1,485,000 |
|||
Three-year projected total: $4 million to $4.5 million | Three-year projected present value: $3.4 million to $3.7 million | |||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. Lastly, the interviewees and survey respondents noted that deploying the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform could have a positive impact on revenues and, therefore, profit. At the simplest level, unifying on a single cloud-based platform could enable organizations to have better conversations about data and customer analytics, which would improve their abilities to attract and retain customers. For example, the director of data platforms from the professional services organization said: “We’re having really active discussion surrounding customer analytics that we couldn’t even have two years back. We’re expecting to achieve a 5 percentage point improvement to retention once we’re able to more fully deploy the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.”
The data and analytics domain manager at a financial services organization noted that investing in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform could improve both cross-selling and retention. They said: “The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform will help us discover patterns of behavior and run predictive analytics on our customer base, improving our ability to cross-sell and prevent churn. By getting attractive products in front of the right customer faster than before, we’ve already received an €80 million return on our investment in the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform products last year, and [we] are expecting about €20 million more from a separate business line as well.”
The director of data platforms from the professional services firm also noted that the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform enabled their organization to launch a new business line. They said: “Once we knew more about our customers, we could expand from seasonal to yearlong engagements with them. We actually recently spun up a new, nonseasonal financial product for our customer base. The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform solutions we currently use have helped us to reduce the cost and timeline for launching this, with bottlenecks reduced from three months down to 3 minutes.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $1.1 million (low) to $2.9 million (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1LOW F1MID F1HIGH |
Annual revenue | Composite | $36,000,000,000 $36,000,000,000 $36,000,000,000 |
$36,000,000,000 $36,180,000,000 $36,360,000,00 |
$36,180,000,000 $36,360,900,000 $36,905,400,000 |
|||
F2LOW F2MID F2HIGH |
Improvement to revenue | Interviews and survey | 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% |
0.5% 1.0% 1.5% |
1.0% 1.5% 2.0% |
|||
F3 | Profit margin | Composite | 5% | 5% | 5% | |||
F4 | Percentage improvement attributable to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform versus human skill and other technologies | Composite | 5% | 5% | 5% | |||
F5 | Percent benefit achieved | A6 | 50% | 100% | 100% | |||
FtLOW FtMID FtHIGH |
Improved income from better customer analytics | F1*F2*F3*F4*F5 | $0 $225,000 $450,000 |
$450,000 $904,500 $1,363,500 |
$904,500 $1,363,500 $1,845,270 |
|||
Three-year projected total: $1.4 million to $3.7 million | Three-year projected present value: $1.1 million to $2.9 million | |||||||
View More
View Less
|
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Partner ecosystem. The interviewees noted that their organizations benefitted from Microsoft’s efforts to build a broad partner ecosystem in the data and analytics space. For example, the director of analytics from the healthcare industry said: “Microsoft has a great partner ecosystem. They’re attacking all the verticals, providing tooling, and supporting capabilities across the industry.” The director of data platforms from the professional services firm said: “Azure’s broad partner ecosystem enables us to focus on our needs while Azure does the background work to vet third-party vendors. This really helps build our internal ecosystem quickly.”
Reduced risk of a breach. Interviewees said the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform increases efficiency for security professionals in both posture and threat management and that it also enables an unquantified reduction in the risk of a material security breach. For example, the director of data platforms from the professional services firm said: “We have almost 80,000 seasonal workers join us each year, [and] the [onboarding] and off-boarding of which can get quite clumsy, especially regarding security on- premises. With the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, all of this is much easier.”
The data and analytics architect from a financial services firm said: “We sit at the intersection of health and finance, so security is a key concern for us. To get the level of security we have with the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform would require significantly more work on-premises.”
Improved customer service. The director of analytics from the healthcare industry noted that the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform enabled their organization to provide better service to its patients. They said: “By looking at the data of how we spend our time, we’ve been able to identify important trends not only about productivity, but also about safety. Our practitioners now get to spend more time with patients as we’ve optimized their work, and we’ve won the Florence Nightingale Award for excellence in healthcare statistics, which would have never happened without the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.”
Easier to find and train talent. The director of data platforms for the professional services firm shared: “With the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, our tech stack has become much easier. No one is stuck using one single language to access any given solution. This allows teams to share talent, exposing our resources to more technologies, keeping work interesting, and making it much easier to not only find but also retain talent.”
Better employee experience. Regarding employee experience, the director of analytics from the healthcare firm said: “Life is so much better. We’re no longer firefighting everything. The team has quiet time. They have the headspace to focus on our real needs and do more analysis.”
Artificial intelligence and machine learning. The interviewees and survey respondents also said their organizations get unquantifiable benefits out of the adoption of AI and ML internally. For example, the director of data platforms from the professional services firm shared: “In addition to our optical character recognition API, we’ve been able to add an API that automates the classification of documents and titles them appropriately. This removes the work from our customers to classify each document they upload, improving their experience. It also improves organization on our end, reducing the time and cost to customer of completing their paperwork.”
The director of analytics from the healthcare firm shared: “We’re running a number of AI experiments. We’re working with natural-language processing to look through clinical notes and identify high-risk patients. We’re doing process mining to better understand patient flow and identify bottlenecks where patients are getting lost in the system, and [we’re] also working with predictive analytics at the population level to identify factors contributing to large-scale mental health events.”
Support. Lastly, interviewees said Microsoft’s support is another unquantified benefit of using the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform. The platform architect from the energy firm said: “Microsoft listens and understands market conditions. They know where we are facing the most challenges. They’ve been willing to work with us to understand gaps in their offerings and close these. We don’t have this great of an experience with many vendors.”
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Open standards. Interviewees said Microsoft’s reliance on open standards enabled their organizations to remain flexible in their data and analytics operations. For example, the platform architect from the energy firm noted: “We don’t want to lock any of our teams into black-box solutions. If we need to go outside of Microsoft, we can because they’ve established an open, plug-and-play ecosystem that enables this flexibility.”
The director of data platforms from the professional services firm said: “We haven’t had any need to go outside the Microsoft ecosystem yet. But knowing that the option is there with Microsoft’s use of open standards is attractive if we do ever have to.”
Better decision-making. The director of data platforms from the professional services firm noted: “I strongly believe the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform has enabled us to make better decisions. With lower data complexity, we have much higher-quality discussions about our data and analytics results. We no longer have lengthy discussions about whose data is right and whose is wrong because we’re all looking at the same thing.”
Agile project management. The interviewees also noted the ability to adopt agile processes internally thanks to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform. For example, the platform architect from the energy firm said: “The Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform has helped us remove centralized dependencies on centralized teams. We now have a self-service platform [and] a thin layer on top of Azure services to provide governance and self-service capabilities.”
The director of data platforms from the professional services firm added: “We’ve changed the structure of our teams entirely thanks to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform. We now work in squads of eight to 10 people that are so well-oiled they just handle all tasks themselves. We move much faster now.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A.)
Ref. | Costs | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gtr | Total Azure fees for the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform | $0 | $356,638 | $713,062 | $1,426,337 | $2,496,037 | $1,985,152 |
Htr | Cost of migration | $9,900,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $9,900,000 | $9,900,000 |
Itr | Cost of ongoing management | $0 | $528,000 | $528,000 | $528,000 | $1,584,000 | $1,313,058 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $9,900,000 | $884,638 | $1,241,062 | $1,954,337 | $13,980,037 | $13,198,210 |
Evidence and data. Microsoft charges for the total amount of compute and storage required to run data and analytics workloads in Azure using the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform solutions. Therefore, the total cost of Azure fees is dependent on the total amount of data in an Azure-based data lake, the amount of this data needed to run analytics workloads, and any transactional data.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Azure fees will vary with:
Results.To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2 million.
Ref | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | TB of data in data lake | Composite | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 | |
G2 | TB of data processed by analytics platform | Composite | 0 | 42 | 83 | 167 | |
G3 | Azure fees | Composite | $0 | $324,216 | $648,238 | $1,296,670 | |
Gt | Total Azure fees for the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform | G3 | $0 | $324,216 | $648,238 | $1,296,670 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Gtr | Total Azure fees for the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform (risk-adjusted | $0 | $356,638 | $713,062 | $1,426,337 | ||
Three-year total: $2,496,037 | Three-year present value: $1,985,152 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. The interviewees noted that their organizations incurred labor costs associated with the migration of data from their on-premises infrastructures to the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform.
The interviewees shared varying costs associated with migration:
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. The cost of migration will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $9.9 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Number of FTEs needed for migration | Interviews | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
H2 | Fully burdened annual rate of an IT professional | A4 | $120,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Ht | Cost of migration | H1*H2 | $9,000,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Htr | Cost of migration (risk-adjusted) | $9,900,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Three-year total: $9,900,000 | Three-year present value: $9,900,000 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
Evidence and data. The interviewees shared that their organizations incurred internal time costs to manage the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform on an ongoing basis, but they said these costs were less than needed in their firms’ prior on-premises infrastructures.
For example, the data and analytics architect from a financial services firm said, “It’s a newly formed team, but we’re expecting about four to five resources to be able to be moved to higher value work, which would be a little more than 50% of our current on-premises needs.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. The total cost of ongoing management will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $1.3 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I1 | IT professionals needed for ongoing management | Interviews | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
I2 | Fully burdened annual rate of an IT professional | A4 | $0 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | |
It | Cost of ongoing management | I1*I2 | $0 | $480,000 | $480,000 | $480,000 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Itr | Cost of ongoing management (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $528,000 | $528,000 | $528,000 | ||
Three-year total: $1,584,000 | Three-year present value: $1,313,058 | ||||||
View More
View Less
|
These risk-adjusted PROI and projected NPV values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($9,900,000) | ($884,638) | ($1,241,062) | ($1,954,337) | ($13,980,037) | ($13,198,210) |
Total benefits (low) | $0 | $6,375,150 | $11,850,300 | $13,547,500 | $31,772,950 | $25,767,664 |
Total benefits (mid) | $0 | $8,404,950 | $15,839,400 | $17,935,534 | $42,179,884 | $34,206,508 |
Total benefits (high) | $0 | $10,666,500 | $20,311,500 | $23,020,270 | $53,998,270 | $43,778,651 |
Net benefits (low) | ($9,900,000) | $5,490,512 | $10,609,238 | $11,593,163 | $17,792,913 | $12,569,454 |
Net benefits (mid) | ($9,900,000) | $7,520,312 | $14,598,338 | $15,981,197 | $28,199,847 | $21,008,298 |
Net benefits (high) | ($9,900,000) | $9,781,862 | $19,070,438 | $21,065,933 | $40,018,233 | $30,580,441 |
PROI (low) | 95% | |||||
PROI (mid) | 159% | |||||
PROI (high) | 232% | |||||
View More
View Less
|
New Technology: Projected Total Economic Impact (New Tech TEI) is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value of their products and services to clients. The New Tech TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate and justify the projected tangible value of IT initiatives to senior management and key business stakeholders.
Projected Benefits represent the projected value to be delivered to the business by the product. The New Tech TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of projected benefits and the measure of projected costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Projected Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value of the product. The projected cost category within New Tech TEI captures incremental ongoing costs over the existing environment that are associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Role | Industry | Region | Employees | Date of Interview |
---|---|---|---|---|
Data and analytics architect | Financial services | EMEA | 2,000 | March 2023 |
Director of data platforms | Professional services | Global | 3,600 | March 2023 |
Data and analytics domain manager | Financial services | Global | 42,000 | March 2023 |
Platform architect | Energy | Global | 48,000 | March 2023 |
Director of analytics | Healthcare | EMEA | 1.2 million | February 2023 |
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.