July 2022
More and more companies are allowing employees to work from anywhere to improve the employee experience. Recent Forrester research found that about 70% of US companies will choose either a fully remote or an office + anywhere hybrid model. Almost one in six organizations will embrace an anywhere-first model, and more than six in 10 global leaders anticipate a permanently higher rate of full-time remote employees.1 These trends reestablish the centrality of the PC in the future of work and digital life.
Windows 11 is the latest release of Microsoft’s Windows operating system (OS). Positioned as the OS for hybrid work, the new features introduced focus on: 1) productivity and collaboration, 2) IT management efficiency, and 3) security. On the back end, Windows 11 is built on the same code base as Windows 10, making backward compatibility robust and upgrading enterprise PCs easier.
Microsoft commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Windows 11.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Windows 11 on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed eight representatives at six organizations with experience using Windows 11. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is an organization with $1 billion in annual revenue and 2,000 employees.
All interviewees noted how their organizations are migrating Windows 10 devices to Windows 11. In sharing their interest in Windows 11, interviewees stated that wanting to explore new features introduced, needing to adapt to a more hybrid work environment, and realizing that future developments will likely happen on Windows 11 were reasons to migrate sooner rather than later. Specifically, interviewees were interested in the security and performance improvements, the integration and compatibility with modern architecture such as cloud services and microservices, and operational efficiency they could realize from investing in Windows 11.
After the investment in Windows 11, the interviewees shared the various improvements they have seen in their business environment. Key results from the investment include improved end-user productivity, a more secure OS environment, as well as operational efficiency in their security and IT management.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Using Windows 11 allowed the average end user to be 5% to 15% more productive. This increased productivity is rooted in Windows 11 giving users the ability to customize their workspaces, which allows them to quickly access their most-used applications. Additionally, Windows 11’s processing time is faster than the previous OS. For certain activities, such as application development, Windows 11 also means software developers can build mobile or browser-based applications without needing to access emulators, which is something that was not possible in their previous OS.
By using Windows 11, the composite organization’s OS environment is more secure from malware and ransomware threats. Windows 11 has specifically introduced security features targeting users that work in a hybrid or remote manner. Additionally, many security features that users had to toggle on in the previous OS are now on by default on Windows 11. Over three years, the composite organization has been able to improve the risk profile of its OS by 20% to 30% per year.
The composite organization also realizes certain operational efficiency gains in its IT organization after migrating to Windows 11. As Windows 11 comes with several self-service features, the composite saw the number of OS-related help desk requests its IT organization receives decrease by as much as 90% per year after a period of adjustment. Additionally, the improvements in the OS environment security introduced by Windows 11 allowed the composite organization to reduce its spending on third-party security software licensing. This 2% to 10% cost savings per year represents recouped resources that can be reallocated elsewhere.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified for this study include:
Microsoft built Windows 11 on the same code as Windows 10, making backward compatibility robust and upgrading enterprise PCs easier. As a result, the IT team managing the composite organization’s migration from Windows 10 to Windows 11 requires no significant user training. The update is meant to be a seamless process that should not be intrusive to the user utilizing the OS.
The composite organization sees that Windows 11 has better compatibility with some of the legacy products and vendor products it uses, especially as those products continue to develop their newer versions. It believe vendors will shift to offer additional functionality that it can only use with Windows 11.
The composite organization also believes Windows 11 integrates better with other tools and solutions offered within the Microsoft ecosystem. For example, in organizations with Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, users can request different types of application licenses. These will automatically be embedded into their desktop ecosystems, making the integration seamless.
By adopting the newest and latest OS in Windows 11, the composite organization believes it is building its brand as a modern company. The previously mentioned integration benefits with all the other modernized technology puts the composite organization in a great position to continue building this brand.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Most organizations that already use Windows 10 do not pay to upgrade into Windows 11.3 For the composite organization, some of the initial implementation costs it has to consider include the cost to replace a portion of its hardware, desktops, and laptops to ensure they meet the technology requirements, particularly the need for hardware with Trusted Platform Module (TPM) 2.0, needed to install Windows 11. Additionally, some time and effort are required for the composite organization’s IT team to plan out the most effective and efficient migration schedule. This must take into account the hardware upgrade cost and additional testing, like application and peripheral compatibility testing, that needs to be done before the upgrade can be safely released into the IT environment.
Once Windows 11 is set up, the composite organization needs time to manage and test the monthly and yearly updates that Microsoft will introduce. That being said, this effort will be the exact same the composite organization would make using Windows 10. As the adoption rate of Windows 11 increases year over year, there will also be additional costs for hardware upgrades to ensure they all meet Windows 11’s technology requirement. This can follow the composite organization’s usual device refresh schedule or can push it to upgrade a percentage of its devices outside the usual refresh schedule. Depending on the capability and availability of its IT environment, additional planning and implementation effort may be needed until there is close to full adoption of Windows 11.
Forrester modeled a range of projected low-, medium-, and high-impact outcomes based on evaluated risk. This financial analysis projects that the composite organization accrues the following three-year net present value (NPV) for each scenario by enabling Windows 11:
Figures in chart are projections for the mid-case scenario
The objective of the framework is to identify the potential cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the projected impact that Windows 11 can have on an organization.
Forrester Consulting also conducted an online survey of 351 cybersecurity leaders at global enterprises in the US, the UK, Canada, Germany, and Australia. Survey participants included managers, directors, VPs, and C-level executives who are responsible for cybersecurity decision-making, operations, and reporting. Questions provided to the participants sought to evaluate leaders' cybersecurity strategies and any breaches that have occurred within their organizations. Respondents opted into the survey via a third-party research panel, which fielded the survey on behalf of Forrester in November 2020. Data referenced in this study is based on a subset of data for organizations with 5,000 or more employees.
Interviewed Microsoft stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Windows 11.
Interviewed eight representatives at six organizations using Windows 11 in a pilot or beta stage to obtain data with respect to projected costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a projected financial model representative of the interviews using the New Tech TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of New Tech TEI in modeling the investment’s potential impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Microsoft and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Windows 11.
Microsoft reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Microsoft and Forrester provided customer names for the interviews. Microsoft did not participate in the interviews.
Role | Industry | Region | Total Employees (% of Windows users) |
---|---|---|---|
CIO | Investment management | Global | 750 (90%) |
CIO | E-commerce | US | 5,000 (95%) |
Head of IT | Insurance | Global | 750 (100%) |
Security operations (SecOps) manager | Insurance | Global | 750 (100%) |
Technical lead | Insurance | Global | 750 (100%) |
CISO | IT Services | Global | 3,200 (90%) |
Senior director of IT architecture | Financial trading | Global | 4,000 (60%) |
CIO | Investment management | US | 900 (75%) |
Prior to migrating to Windows 11, interviewees’ organizations mostly used Windows 10. While a number of organizations had a form of mixed environment between Windows and a non-Windows OS, the focus of the migration to Windows 11 is on users that previously used Windows 10.
The interviewees noted some of the reasons they were interested in migrating away from Windows 10, including:
Interviewees shared that they were interested in some of the new features and enhancements that were available on Windows 11. Security features and customizations to boost the user experience were two features that interviewees were most interested in exploring further. A CIO in investment management noted, “We heard and wanted to see the improvements in user experience in Windows 11, especially since we didn’t have to pay Microsoft to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11.”
A CISO in IT services added: “We were excited to explore the security enhancements made on Windows 11. In past years, we have seen some vulnerabilities impacting OS. It seems like Windows 11 is focused on tackling them with improvements in security controls and automation capabilities.”
Interviewees were also interested in the positioning of Windows 11 as the OS for remote and hybrid work. As companies everywhere embrace hybrid and remote work models, interviewees wanted to explore the enhancements that focus specifically on that experience. A CIO in e-commerce said: “With the rise of cybercrime, the ramifications of COVID-19, and [the rise of] work from home (WFH), security is always top of mind. Windows 11 was introducing features that would work well for organizations that are adapting their business to be more cloud friendly and introduce remote or hybrid work.” For example, Windows 11 integrates Teams connections directly into the Taskbar in order to make hybrid and remote work easier.
Interviewees also shared that they anticipate Microsoft and its partners to focus future product and feature development on Windows 11. As migration would take time, they decided to plan ahead and gradually migrate users away from Windows 10. A senior director of IT architecture in financial trading shared: “Rollout [and OS migration] can take several years, especially as hardware needs to be refreshed. We know eventually manufacturers will start pushing only the new OS [i.e., Windows 11], so it is better for us to start as soon as possible.” A CIO in investment management added: “We needed to start user migration because it won’t happen all at once. There is a learning curve to adoption that needs to be considered.”
The interviewees’ organizations were specifically interested in Windows 11 because it could:
With security being a big driver for OS migration, interviewees were interested in Windows 11’s security features. A CIO in e-commerce said, “The fact that some of the security features are always on by default, as opposed to us having to turn it on or off, was another factor [in us deciding to try Windows 11].”
Interviewees were also interested in how customizable Windows 11 is when compared to other operating systems. A CIO in investment management shared: “Windows 11 allows better customization than Windows 10, which makes some of our user workflows easier to process and more streamlined. Some of the user experience around obtaining information is better.”
Some interviewees shared specific interest from their technical workers in how Windows 11 could better support activities like application development. A CISO in IT services shared, “Windows 11 comes with the ability to do development and testing of applications faster.” A senior director of IT architecture in financial trading added: “We were not able to run [phone or browser-based] applications with our previous OS without an emulator. Now we can with Windows 11.”
Some interviewees shared that Windows 11 was better positioned for integration with the other more modern technology that their organizations were using or planning to use in the near future. A CIO in investment management explained, “Windows 11 works so much better on some of the later, more modern architectures, such as microservices or cloud services.”
For interviewees that required a high-performance computing environment, they noted needing an OS with high processing performance. A CIO in investment management said: “Windows 11 is better optimized from a performance perspective, in terms of latency and performance load. A lot of our strategy depends on high-performance computing, so [migrating to Windows 11] was desirable.”
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the six interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
A global organization with $1 billion in annual revenue and 2,000 total employees. The composite organization is migrating from Windows 10 for all its desktops and laptops.
The composite organization started its adoption of Windows 11 with 5% of its total employees involved in a pilot. In Year 1, the adoption rate increases to 40%. This then further increases to 80% and 90% in Year 2 and Year 3, respectively. All its hardware devices follow a four-year depreciation cycle, and thus are replaced every four years. The migration to Windows 11 forces the composite organization to upgrade 30% of its hardware devices outside the usual refresh cycle.
Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total projected benefits - Low | $316,448 | $635,056 | $728,000 | $1,679,504 | $1,359,477 |
Total projected benefits - Mid | $530,172 | $1,068,264 | $1,208,083 | $2,806,519 | $2,272,487 |
Total projected benefits - High | $743,896 | $1,500,032 | $1,712,950 | $3,956,878 | $3,202,930 |
Interviewees shared that Windows 11’s improvements from a user experience (UX) and user interface (UI) perspective meant that users could access information and applications faster, which in turn allowed for better collaboration and productivity.
Interviewees also shared that Windows 11 better integrated with some of the more modern architecture, such as cloud and microservices. Based on their early implementation, interviewees projected that their organizations would realize further time savings on activities such as application development from not having to use an emulator and because processing time is faster for Windows 11 than Windows 10.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes that:
This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $689,000 (low) to $2,100,000 (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Total employees | Composite | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||
A2 | Percentage of users whose productivity is directly impacted by Windows 11 | Assumption | 30% | 30% | 30% | ||
A3 | Percentage of users that fully adopted Windows 11 | Composite | 40% | 80% | 90% | ||
A4 | Number of end-users impacted | A1*A3*A2 | 240 | 480 | 540 | ||
A5 | Percentage of tasks that could be impacted by Windows 11 | Assumption | 20% | 20% | 20% | ||
A6 | Average fully burdened annual salary of end-user | Assumption | $135,000 | $135,000 | $135,000 | ||
A7Low A7Mid A7High |
Percentage faster with Windows 11 |
Interviews |
5% 10% 15% |
5% 10% 15% |
5% 10% 15% |
||
A8 | Productivity recapture | Assumption | 50% | 50% | 50% | ||
AtLow AtMid AtHigh |
Improvement in end-user productivity |
A4*A6*A5*A7*A8 |
$162,000 $324,000 $486,000 |
$324,000 $648,000 $972,000 |
$364,500 $729,000 $1,093,500 |
||
Three-year projected total: $850,500 to $2,551,500 | Three-year projected present value: $688,896 to $2,066,687 | ||||||
|
Interviewees shared that some security features that were previously part of Defender were on by default on Windows 11. Some of the security enhancements introduced on Windows 11 also allowed better protection at the OS and hardware level.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes that:
This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $434,000 (low) to $651,000 (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Number of breaches resulting in exposure or loss of data experienced annually | Forrester research | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||
B2 | Average cost of a mega data breach as percentage of annual revenue | CISA report | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | ||
B3 | Annual revenue | Composite | $1,000,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 | ||
B4 | Average cost of breach | B1*B2*B3 | $8,500,000 | $8,500,000 | $8,500,000 | ||
B5Low B5Mid B5High |
Improvement in risk profile after using Windows11 |
Interview |
20% 25% 30% |
20% 25% 30% |
20% 25% 30% |
||
B6 | Percentage attribution to Windows 11 | Interview | 15% | 15% | 15% | ||
B7 | Percentage of users that fully adopted Windows 11 | A3 | 40% | 80% | 90% | ||
BtLow BtMid BtHigh |
Enhanced security of OS environment |
B4*B5*B6*B7 |
$102,000 $127,500 $153,000 |
$204,000 $255,000 $306,000 |
$229,500 $286,875 $344,250 |
||
Three-year projected total: $535,500 to $803,250 | Three-year projected present value: $433,749 to $650,624 | ||||||
|
Interviewees shared that Windows 11 created opportunities for their IT environment to be more efficient. First, interviewees noted that Windows 11 comes with a more robust self-service feature that should help users address any issue they may have, which should reduce the number of help desk requests its IT organization receives in the long run.
Related to the previous benefit of Windows 11 enhancing the security of its OS environment, interviewees also noted that depending on how much more secure their environment is could encourage them to discontinue any third-party security software licensing it currently has. This would result in cost savings that could be reallocated elsewhere in the organization.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes that:
This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $237,000 (low) to $486,000 (high).
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Number of help desk requests per year | Composite | 24,000 | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
C2 | Percentage related to OS/desktop/laptop | Assumption | 10% | 10% | 10% | ||
C3 | Adoption rate of Windows 11 | A3 | 40% | 80% | 90% | ||
C4Low C4Mid C4High |
Reduction in OS-related help desk requests due to Windows 11 |
Interview |
0% 0% 0% |
15% 55% 85% |
20% 60% 90% |
||
C5 | Average cost per ticket | Forrester research | $6 | $6 | $6 | ||
C6Low C6Mid C6High |
Subtotal: Operational efficiency in IT help desk |
C1*C2*C3*D4 |
$0 $0 $0 |
$2,160 $7,920 $12,240 |
$2,880 $8,640 $12,960 |
||
C7 | Percentage of IT spend of revenue | Forrester research | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.8% | ||
C8 | Percentage of IT budget spent on security | Forrester research | 35.39% | 35.39% | 35.39% | ||
C9 | Percentage of spend that is software | Forrester research | 19.5% | 19.5% | 19.5% | ||
C10 | Total security and productivity application licensing costs | B3*C7*C8*C9 | $2,622,399 | $2,622,399 | $2,622,399 | ||
C11Low C11Mid C11High |
Percentage of cost savings due to Windows 11 |
Interview |
2% 3% 4% |
4% 6% 8% |
5% 7% 10% |
||
C12Low C12Mid C12High |
Subtotal: Cost savings from retiring software and applications |
C10*C11 |
$52,448 $78,672 $104,896 |
$104,896 $157,344 $209,792 |
$131,120 $183,568% $262,240 |
||
CtLow CtMid CtHigh |
Operational efficiency for IT environment |
C6 + C12 |
$52,448 $78,672 $104,896 |
$107,056 $192,208 $222,032 |
$134,000 $183,568 $275,200 |
||
Three-year projected total: $293,504 to $602,128 | Three-year projected present value: $236,832 to $485,619 | ||||||
|
Additional benefits that customers experienced but were not able to quantify include:
Interviewees shared that since Windows 11 is built upon the same foundation as Windows 10 there was no need for significant user training that would be associated with other OS migrations. From an IT perspective, the code and structure of Windows 11 is meant to be very familiar, so the implementing IT organization would not have to relearn new processes or do significant user training. A CISO in IT services said: “The time avoidance in user training can be quite sizable. If it was a significant uptake to upgrade [to] a totally new OS that requires us to learn [it] from scratch, we might have chosen not to do upgrade. Part of the reason we are doing the upgrade is it is the same look and feel.”
Interviewees shared that Windows 11 was more compatible and better integrated with some of the vendor and legacy solutions they currently use in their environment when compared to their previous OS. A CIO at an investment management firm said: “Windows 11 has better compatibility with some of our other legacy or vendor products. They have better adaptability and compatibility with the general products that are built for Windows. So, vendors start to offer additional functionality that can only be used with Windows 11.”
Additionally, interviewees shared that Windows 11 also integrated better with some of their more modern technology, such as cloud services. A CISO at IT services said: “As an enterprise, we have a sizable population who have migrated towards cloud. Windows 11 has a more seamless integration with cloud services, and the migration process is a lot easier [compared to what it would have been with the previous OS].”
Interviewees expressed that using Windows 11 better positioned them to access applications developed by Microsoft within its ecosystem, as well as its partners. Windows 11 being the latest OS, they understand future development will happen on top of it. A CISO at IT services stated: “As E5 users, we can automatically request different types of licenses needed for individual applications. Those applications will automatically get embedded into [the laptops’] ecosystem. It’s a very seamless addition compared to in the past.”
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Windows 11 and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
In the long run, interviewees shared that adopting Windows 11 can play a role on how others perceive their organization. Using the latest and most modern OS, which better integrates with most of the latest technology, allows organizations to position themselves as a more modern, forward-looking company. A SecOps manager in insurance said: “[By adopting Windows 11], we have gone from a very traditional, static, old-school way of using technology to now using a new platform that enables people to work in a hybrid world. We are transforming our core platform to be more modernized and integrated.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
Ref. | Costs | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Etr | Initial planning and implementation costs | $82,500 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $82,500 | $82,500 |
Ftr | Future implementation cost | $0 | $230,670 | $230,670 | $221,100 | $682,440 | $566,452 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $82,500 | $230,670 | $230,670 | $221,100 | $764,940 | $648,952 |
Interviewees shared that initial planning and implementation mostly involved the cost and time spent to set up the first group of users that migrated to Windows 11. Interviewees already owned Windows 11 licenses as part of their existing agreements with Microsoft, thus there was no additional money paid to Microsoft to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11. The main cost was the expenditure to upgrade a number of laptops and desktops to meet the technology requirements of Windows 11, specifically to TPM 2.0-based hardware required for security. While most organizations had a set hardware refresh schedule of three to four years, the timeline of starting Windows 11 did not always align with this schedule and forced upgrade efforts outside the usual refresh schedule. Additionally, the IT organization dedicated staff to planning the pilot, determining the number of users involved, and assessing the current IT environment to see what adjustments needed to be made.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes that:
The exact costs incurred by an organization related to initial planning and implementation will depend on:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $82,500
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | New desktops, laptops, or Windows tablets purchased | Composite | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D2 | Average cost per new device | Assumption | $1,200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D3 | Hardware upgrade time (hours) | Interview | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D4 | IT admin hourly salary | Assumption | $35 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D5 | Subtotal: Total cost related to upgrading hardware | D1*D2+D3*D4 | $40,200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D6 | Planning and implementation FTE | Interview | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D7 | Planning and implementation time (years) | Composite | 0.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D8 | Planning and implementation FTE annual fully burdened salary | Assumption | $145,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
D9 | Percentage of time dedicated | Interview | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Dt | Initial planning and implementation costs | D5+D6*D7*D8*D9 | $75,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Dtr | Initial planning and implementation costs (risk-adjusted) | $82,500 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Three-year total: $82,500 | Three-year present value: $82,500 | ||||||
|
The migration of users from Windows 10 to Windows 11 is unlikely to happen immediately. Interviewees shared that it would be a gradual process that takes place over several years before they reach full adoption. During the gradual migration, more desktops and laptops would have to be upgraded to meet the Windows 11 technology requirements. While some would be replaced in the usual refresh cycle, a percentage would have to be upgraded outside the usual cycle. In terms of time dedicated to planning and implementation, the majority of the planning took place in the initial phase. However, some more planning and implementation was needed every year before the company reached full adoption (or as close to it).
Additionally, there will be annual and monthly updates introduced by Microsoft. Organizations would typically have to test these updates before releasing them to their environment. However, this effort is no different between Windows 11 and Windows 10 users.
For the composite organization, Forrester assumes that:
The exact costs incurred by an organization related to future implementation will depend on:
To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $566,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | New desktops,laptops,or Windows tablets purchased | Composite | 0 | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
E2 | Average cost per new device | Forrester assumption | $0 | $1,200 | $1,200 | $71,000 | |
E3 | Hardware upgrade time (hours) | Interview | 0 | 600 | 600 | 600 | |
E4 | IT admin hourly salary | Forrester assumption | $0 | $35 | $35 | $35 | |
E5 | Subtotal: Total cost related to upgrading hardware | E1*E2*E3*E4 | $0 | $201,000 | $201,000 | $201,000 | |
E6 | Planning and implementation FTE | 50%*D6, None in Year 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
E7 | Planning and implementation time (years) | 50%*D7, None in Year 3 | 0 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0 | |
E8 | Planning and implementation FTE annual fully burdened salary | Forrester assumption | $0 | $145,000 | $145,000 | $0 | |
E9 | Percentage of time dedicated | Interview | 0 | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
E10 | Subtotal: Total cost related to planning and implementation | E6*E7*E8*E9 | $0 | $8,700 | $8,700 | $0 | |
Et | Future implementation cost | E5+E10 | $0 | $209,700 | $209,700 | $201,000 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
Etr | Future implementation cost (risk-adjusted | $0 | $230,670 | $230,670 | $221,100 | ||
Three-year total: $682,440 | Three-year present value: $566,452 | ||||||
|
These risk-adjusted PROI and projected NPV values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($82,500) | ($230,670) | ($230,670) | ($221,100) | ($764,940) | ($648,952) |
Total benefits (low) | $0 | $316,448 | $635,056 | $728,000 | $1,679,504 | $1,359,477 |
Total benefits (mid) | $0 | $530,172 | $1,068,264 | $1,208,083 | $2,806,519 | $2,272,487 |
Total benefits (high) | $0 | $743,896 | $1,500,032 | $1,712,950 | $3,956,878 | $3,202,930 |
PROI (low) | 109% | |||||
PROI (mid) | 250% | |||||
PROI (high) | 394% | |||||
|
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the PROI and projected NPV for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
New Technology: Projected Total Economic Impact (New Tech TEI) is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value of their products and services to clients. The New Tech TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate and justify the projected tangible value of IT initiatives to senior management and key business stakeholders.
Projected Benefits represent the projected value to be delivered to the business by the product. The New Tech TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of projected benefits and the measure of projected costs, allowing for a full examination of the ef f ect of the technology on the entire organization.
Projected Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value of the product. The projected cost category within New Tech TEI captures incremental ongoing costs over the existing environment that are associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 th at are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
“Windows 11 Aims To Delight Users But Needs To Establish Its Purpose,” Forrester Research, Inc., June 24, 2021.
1 Source: “The Anywhere-Work Preflight Checklist,” Forrester Research, Inc., April 22, 2022.
2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
3 Customers with Windows 10 Home or Pro edition can upgrade to Windows 11 for free. Customers with a Volume Licensing agreement for Windows Enterprise edition that includes Software Assurance or a Windows 10/11 Enterprise E3 or higher subscription always have free upgrade rights.
4 Fully burdened salary includes both the direct wages and indirect costs of hiring and employment. Burden rate refers to indirect costs of employment beyond direct compensation, including, but not limited to: hiring costs, training costs, financial services, paid time off, sick leave, expenses, retirement contributions, payroll taxes, and incremental technology and workplace costs for the employee.
5 Data represented is based on a data subset of organizations with 5,000 or more employees, taken from Forrester Consulting’s “Q4 2020 Cost of a Cybersecurity Breach Survey.”
6 Source: “Cost of a Cyber Incident: Systematic Review and Cross-Validation,” Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, October 2020.
7 Source: “The UX ROI For B2B Tech Vendors,” Forrester Research, Inc., December 10, 2021.
8 Source: “2022 IT And Digital Budget Benchmarks, North America,” Forrester Research, Inc., March 16, 2022.
9 Source: Forrester Analytics Business Technographics Security Survey, 2021.
10 Source: “2022 IT And Digital Budget Benchmarks, North America,” Forrester Research, Inc., March 16, 2022.
11 Fully burdened salary includes both the direct wages and indirect costs of hiring and employment. Burden rate refers to indirect costs of employment beyond direct compensation, including, but not limited to hiring costs, training costs, financial services, paid time off, sick leave, expenses, retirement contributions, payroll taxes, and incremental technology and workplace costs for the employee.
12 Source: Ibid.
13 Source: Ibid.
14 Source: Ibid.